Showing posts with label lack of jurisdiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lack of jurisdiction. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION DUE TO FAILURE OF MAGISTRATE TO COMPLETE DUTIES




Cause No(s). _____________________________

The State of Texas                            §           IN THE _________________________ COURT
                                                            §            
VS.                                                      §          ________________________________________                                                               §                    
____________________________   §           __________________ COUNTY, TEXAS




NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION DUE TO FAILURE OF MAGISTRATE TO COMPLETE DUTIES

Notice is hereby given of failure of the magistrate for this case to complete duties imposed upon him by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
  1. __________________________ (the Accused) signed a promise to appear before a magistrate as provided by Texas Transportation Code Section 543.006.
  2. For all purposes here, __________________________ and __________________________ are the same.
  3. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 45 fails to provide for an appearance before a magistrate.
  4.  The Accused previously appeared with the expectation of having an examining hearing by the magistrate according to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  In particular he was expecting to receive the warnings of Article 15.17 and an order stating when and where to go to court for arraignment.
  5. Observation showed that proceedings in the court were conducted according to the procedure of Chapter 17A, being the procedure for corporations and associations.
  6. Examination of the records held in the file for this case fail to show a written order signed by the magistrate ordering the accused to appear for arraignment as required by Article 15.17, but the judge did require a plea in a manner consistent with Article 17A.07 even though no jury been empanelled or waiver of trial by jury made as provided by Article 45.023.
  7. Examination of the records held in the file for this case fail to show that the papers for this case were transferred by the magistrate to the proper clerk as required by Articles 17.30 and 17.31, but which is not required by the procedure provided by Chapter 17A for corporations and corporations. 
  8. A summary of procedure for a defendant who is not a corporation or association relevant to this case was provided to the Court by the filed Notice of Process from Citation to Arraignment.
  9. Proceedings in this case have thus far been conducted under a presumption, known by the prosecutor to be false, that the defendant is a corporation or association.
  10. The Accused has filed his affidavit denying that the defendant is a corporation or association.
  11. Process due to a defendant that is not a corporation or association has not been followed in this case.
  12. Jurisdiction of a court depends upon it maintaining due process.   Tex. Const. Art. 1, Sec. 19; U. S. Const. Amend. V and Amend. XIV.
  13. The attorney representing the State may dismiss a criminal action. CCP Art. 32.02.

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________


          

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the forgoing has been delivered to the following party or counsel of record via delivery conformation, hand delivery or fax on this ______  day of ________________________, 201__.



______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________



_________________________________





INSTRUCTIONS

This document is only filed after the first hearing before the judge and only if the judge does not follow the direction claimed in the pleading. This document is filed as another means to appeal showing the error of the judge not following due process.

Line 1: Where you put the cause numbers of the case.
Line 2: Put either ‘Municipal’, ‘Justice of the Peace’ or County.
Line 3: Put  either ‘In the City of (whatever City)”, “Precinct (whatever number)” or “(whatever county Court it is – like – At Law #11)
Line 4: Put your name in Upper and Lower Caps.
Line 5: Put whatever county the court is in – like – “Galveston”.
Line 6: Put your name in Upper and Lower Caps.
Line 7: Put your name in Upper and Lower Caps.
Line 8: Put your name in all Upper Caps.
Line 9: Sign your name on the line, then below that print your name in Upper and Lower Caps then below that print your address.
Line 10: Put the numbered date.
Line 11: Put the Month.
Line 12: Put  the number to create the current year like 2013.
Line 13: Put prosecutor of the Court that is assigned to the case.
Line 14: Put the address of the prosecutor.
Line 15: Put the City, state and zipcode of the location of the prosecutor.
Line 16: Sign your name on the line, then below that print your name in Upper and Lower Caps then below that print your address.



Original goes to the clerk of the court, one copy to the Prosecutor and one copy for you to keep and have stamped by the clerk. Be sure and NOT include the instruction sheets.

Friday, February 1, 2013

AFFIDAVIT Texas





AFFIDAVIT
Texas                    §
                                §     SS
Dallas County      §
I, Lewis Ray Daniel, the undersigned affiant and Consul General of the Provisional Government of the Republic of Texas, do hereby make this affidavit willingly and with full knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and attest to the veracity of said facts and state that I am competent to testify to same.
On or about June 12, 1998 NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION was mailed by Certified Mail #P 388 292 799 to Frank Newton (hereinafter "Newton"), Chief Administrator and President of the State Bar of Texas, an Administrative Agency (hereinafter "Agency") of the STATE OF TEXAS and to the Supreme Court of the STATE OF TEXAS. Said Notice was received by Newton and by the Supreme Court on June 15, 1998. Said Notice and proof of service are attached and incorporated by reference herein.
There has been no response to NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION.
On or about June 26, 1998 NOTICE OF DEFAULT NIHIL DICIT was mailed by Certified Mail #P 388 293 158 to Frank Newton (hereinafter "Newton"), Chief Administrator and President of the State Bar of Texas, an Administrative Agency (hereinafter "Agency") of the STATE OF TEXAS and to the Supreme Court of the STATE OF TEXAS. Said Notice was received by Newton on July 6, 1998 and by the Supreme Court on or about July 1, 1998. Said Notice and proof of service are attached and incorporated by reference herein.
There has been no response to NOTICE OF DEFAULT NIHIL DICIT.
The STATE OF TEXAS, through its agents, has affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that the State of Texas
Bar Association was created as an Administrative Agency of the Judicial Branch by the State Bar Act.
The STATE OF TEXAS, through its agents, has affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that the President and Chief Administrator of the State Bar of Texas is responsible for all acts of the Agents/Members of the State Bar of Texas which includes, but is not limited to, the acts of all agents of the judicial system of the STATE OF TEXAS.
The STATE OF TEXAS, through its agents, has affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that on November 16, 1995, in cause no. 95-1002, the Supreme Court of the STATE OF TEXAS passed for want of jurisdiction.
The STATE OF TEXAS, through its agents, has affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that this act of the Supreme Court establishes the truth and the fact that the STATE OF TEXAS, its political Subdivisions, and its ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES has no jurisdiction or venue regarding the Republic of Texas and its declared Citizens, whether it be through the government of the STATE OF TEXAS or its Administrative Agencies, such as the State Bar of Texas and its agents or the STATE OF TEXAS Judicial System of Administrative Courts (which includes the STATE OF TEXAS and all political subdivisions of the STATE OF TEXAS).
The STATE OF TEXAS, through its agents, has affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that the STATE OF TEXAS has no jurisdiction, venue, and authority to impose compelled performance or intrude upon the Substantive Rights or Private Property of the Provisional Government or the declared Citizens of the Republic of Texas through the private copyrighted laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations of the STATE OF TEXAS or to prosecute same in the Administrative Courts of the STATE OF TEXAS (which includes the STATE OF TEXAS and all political subdivisions of the STATE OF TEXAS).
Further, Affiant Sayeth Naught

Lewis Ray Daniel, Consul General
Republic of Texas Provisional Government
Date: July 11, 1998

Jesse Doyle Enloe - Witness
/s/ Bob McCrary - Witness

 RELATED LINKS



 YOUTUBE 



 TWITTER

Thursday, January 31, 2013

NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND AUTHORITY


Office of the Consul General
c/o 6080 S. Hulen # 360-106
Fort Worth, Texas [76132]

               NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND AUTHORITY                          To: Jerome J. Shestack, President, Chief Administrator
   American
Bar Association
   750 N. Lake Shore Dr.
   Chicago, IL 60611                               Certified Mail # P 388 293 053
   William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice, Chief Administrator
   United States Supreme Court
   One First Street, NE
   Washington, D.C. 20543                           Certified Mail # P 388 293 054
   Niall Morison, Chief Executive
   Bar of England
   3 Bedford Row London, WC1R 4DB                   Certified Mail # P 388 293 055
Notice Date: July 21, 1998
Lewis Ray Daniel, Consul General of the Provisional Government of the Republic of Texas, does hereby notice the American Bar Association, the United States Supreme Court, and the Bar of England (hereinafter "Agencies") of Lack of Jurisdiction, Venue, and Authority.
Agencies are Administrative Agencies and operate outside of the Organic Law and the Constitution for the United States of America.
There is no Treaty of Annexation to lawfully join Texas to the UNITED STATES. Said "Annexation Process" was done unlawfully and without delegated authority by members of the UNITED STATES Congress in 1845, after a proposed Treaty of Annexation was defeated in the Senate in 1844, and was an international fraud upon the People of Texas and the People of the United States of America.
Maxim of Law: Anything done by fraud is void from the beginning as if it had not been done.
The UNITED STATES and ENGLAND, through Agencies, have imposed private copyrighted laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, trusts, implied contracts upon the People of Texas, for compelled performance, unlawfully and without authority since 1865 and held Texas as a captured Nation of war since that time.
Agencies have no jurisdiction, venue, authority to impose compelled performance or intrude upon the Substantive Rights or Private Property of the Provisional Government, the declared Citizens of the Republic of Texas or the People of Texas through the private copyrighted laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, trusts, implied contracts of the UNITED STATES or to prosecute same in the Courts of the UNITED STATES, Administrative or otherwise.
Notice to the principal is notice to the agent, notice to the agent is notice to the principal.
Any response to this NOTICE is required within 10 calendar days of receipt of this NOTICE.

Lewis Ray Daniel, Consul General
Republic of Texas
Provisional Government

http://web.archive.org/web/20000307011425/http://texasrepublic.com/
 Republic of Texas Former Official website

 RELATED LINKS



 YOUTUBE 



 TWITTER