Friday, February 1, 2013

LEGAL FREEDOM



LEGAL FREEDOM

Synopsis of Redemption in Law
[Used by permission of BBC of America]
    Important note: In studying this material, never go past a word or symbol without knowing how it is defined1. If you have difficulty, go back to the place in the text where you were last doing well, before you get into trouble, and look for a word or symbol that was not understood. This includes even the simplest [every day] words, such as "from" and "as", as well as the legal terms you will encounter. When you find the misunderstood word, consult a good dictionary to become clear as to how the word is defined, including the etymology, and then continue from that point.
Some of the key words you will encounter in the next few paragraphs are defined as follows:
Commerce: all and every interchange between people, including (but not limited to) sexual intercourse, exchange of ideas and the ordinary buying/selling in the marketplace to which the term "commerce" is usually applied. All law is contract; every interchange between people is contract; all commerce is contract. It is a timeless and universal maxim of law. . ."Contracts make the law".
Chattel: personal and moveable property. . .including a slave.
Commercial chattel property: a slave, or permanently indentured servant, by contract, i.e. operation of commercial law.
Law: the rules, or body of rules, defining who possesses what right or authority to use deadly force (violence) against another.
 You will encounter other legal terms in the coming pages...so be sure to consult a law dictionary to understand the meaning of each.
Introduction: The legal status of essentially every man, woman and child on the planet is that of being a slave, commercial chattel property, a hopelessly indentured servant forever. In law it is an all-or-nothing matter: you are either a slave or a sovereign.2 There is no middle ground - you are either one or the other. If you want to be a sovereign in law you must actualize the laws which enable you to be recognized as such. The program this synopsis outlines is a set of legal procedures which enables anyone to attain legally established, recognized freedom and sovereignty.
Preamble: For thousands of years the Powers That Be have been steadfastly constructing the System by which world law and commerce operate. They have developed their System utilizing timeless principles of human interaction which, over the millennia, have been discovered and codified. These fundamental, common-sense principles underlie every form of law extant on the planet. Every legal issue and dispute deals with one or more of these principles since all human interchange is commerce, interact and subsist. Those operating the System have achieved their preeminence by knowing the foundational principles and encrypting them into "codes" for their own benefit, while confusing the masses and keeping them ignorant of such real law and how to employ it correctly. The pinnacle of their efforts to date is the U.C.C. World commerce now functions under; and, is securely entrenched in, the U.C.C. The important points to remember are that while the U.C.C. was formulated for purposes of exploitation and subjugation, it is a particular codification of the universal Uniform Commercial Code, underlying laws of commerce; and, perhaps most importantly, can be employed for our benefit now that the code has been "cracked".
The foundational maxims of the underlying commercial law, from which all law and commerce in the world today derive, are:
1. A workman is worthy of his hire.
2. All are equal under the law (moral and natural law).
3. In commerce truth is sovereign.
4. Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.
5. An unrebutted claim, charge, or affidavit stands as the truth in commerce.
6. An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in commerce.
7. All matters must be expressed to be resolved.
8. He who leaves the field of battle first loses by default.
9. Sacrifice is the measure of credibility (one who has not been damaged by, given to, lost on account of, or put at risk by another has not basis to make claims or charges against him/her.
10. A lien or claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by counter-affidavit point-for-point, resolution by jury, or payment.

Caveat3: You are responsible for yourself and your own actions. If you act in what you do not understand and can support in law. . . the consequences are entirely your own responsibility. This synopsis does not constitute practice of law or giving legal advice. It is for informational purposes only.
In law the ultimate, or supreme, claimant in a matter is called "The Real Party of Interest" (RP0I). The "Real Party in Interest" (RPII) is a front ( a straw man4, such as the "United States" and all its agencies, "State of Texas", etc.) for the RPOI (an actual man, such as one of the Bankers, who are the U.S. Creditors in bankruptcy, the Queen of england, the Pope, etc.). Today, the true Real Parties of interest behind the U.S. bankruptcy, government and New World Order, remain hidden from, and unknown to, the masses. Throughout this synopsis numerous terms are used to designate the RPOI and RPII, which are largely used interchangeably. These include, but are not limited to: "government", "the bankers", "the system", the "Elite", and the like. It must be emphasized that individuals come and go, live and die. The actual identities of the Real Parties of Interest are now irrelevant. The important considerations are that the timeless and established laws of commerce remain intact; and, that the perceived "villains" are not the ultimate source of the problem. Those against whom we rail as conspirators, arch-criminals, etc. Are merely filling in the configuration which we, through our own irresponsibility, ignorance, apathy, stupidity and foolish trust, created. In other words, Pogo is correct: "We have met the enemy and he is us". Both cause and cure reside in ourselves.

I. Fundamental concepts
A. Initial considerations
1. Law is precise. It revolves around how words are defined. Deadly, destructive violence is attached to the words, and the meaning of said words, used in legal documents and proceedings. To have any hope of knowing what you are doing in law, and why, it is essential to know how the words being used are defined. This is the key to what is happening and what must be done. Understand the way the words used are defined in law and you can be clear and function on firm footing; fail to know what the words mean and you can be damaged or even destroyed. An ancient maxim of law states:
"In order rightly to comprehend a thing, inquire first into the names, for a right knowledge to things depends upon their names".
2. The rules of law are set forth in writing, in words, syntax, grammar, etc. The way words are legally defined is the basis of the game. What the rules are, and their practical application and ramifications in use of force, is a function of the legal definitions of the words used to write the rules. Words used in legal matters have different meanings than the same words in ordinary usage. Remember, to "assume" makes an "ass" out of "u" and "me". In the case of law, being an "ass" can mean slavery, imprisonment, or death. As Thomas Jefferson said: "Those who expect to be both ignorant and free are expecting something which never has and never will exist". A list of key terms, and key definitions of those terms, as relates to this process, has been provided below. It is not, however, a substitute for an excellent law dictionary. It is recommended that you obtain one or more of the generally accepted law dictionaries, such as Bouvier's, Ballantine's or Black's. If you can afford it, it is best to have both a copy of the first and the most recent editions, so you may gain a better understanding of what is happening in the world, and to the world, via the law. If cost is a factor, an excellent small legal dictionary, Barron's, is available at any book store for under $15.00. In any event, look up any legal term of which you are not certain. Do not take anything for granted5.
3. You should also acquire, if at all possible, a copy of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.)6, since the U.C.C. is supreme in the world; and, the other codes and bodies of law are all subsets of, and subordinate to, the U.C.C. The "common law" of the planet is commercial law, which is embodied/codified in the U.C.C. All other law amounts to "following rabbit trails" and being endlessly mislead. Deal with the source.
4. With respect to UCC-1 Financing Statement Filings, thus far, most of the Secretary of State offices have been helpful and cooperative7. Documents that have been incorrectly executed have been sent back with explanation of the error. For many people, freedom is of incomparable value. This program is essential for attaining freedom; notwithstanding whatever else one may do - intellectually, emotionally, physically, socially, economically, or spiritually. The worst thing one can do - legally - is nothing. Do not confuse domains of life. The spiritual, etc. Are their own realms, realities and endeavors; law is its own domain and must be managed in its own sphere, as other aspects of life must be in theirs.
5. Notwithstanding the above caveats, commercial law and the commercial process are in many ways very broad, unlike "normal" law. After all, the entire world functions by the commercial process as set forth in the U.C.C. It is important to understand that the Redemption process described herein is fundamentally doable by anyone of normal intelligence. One should not be daunted or cowed by fear that any little mistake might be disastrous. Our disaster thus far is having done nothing - due mostly to ignorance, laziness and foolish trust in "authority". It would be compounded folly to continue to do nothing based upon fear8. Remember "what is difficult for the student is easy for the master".
Understand the central points, become clear concerning the foundation of the matter and build clearly and calmly from that point. Be honest with yourself about what you do not understand and direct your endeavors to rectifying the deficiency. Do not be afraid to ask for help. Once help is given, verify the information in the U.C.C., law dictionaries; and, with other people whom you believe have reason to know (such as those who have successfully accomplished the process). Establish a solid foundation and build on it soundly. Orderly step-by-step progress, in which every aspect of every step is thoroughly understood and derived appropriately from its previous steps, is the mans to obtain complete legal security.
B. The real vs. the imaginary
1. Everyone has two fundamental aspects: real (biological organism, being, substance, aliveness) and abstract (ego9, mental concepts, ideas). This situation is characterized in semantics s the difference between the map and the territory, the name and the thing named. The word "water" is a symbol, an abstraction of the mind, while actual water is tangible, real and able to be experienced by the senses. One cannot drink the word "water".

2. The mind is capable of imagining unlimited varieties and configurations of abstractions. These include non-tangible concepts (and collections of concepts) and mental constructs such as "the people", "nation", "corporation" "trust", "limited partnership"and "government". When an abstraction is treated as real, legally, the result in law is a fictitious entity, "person"10 or "artificial person". It cannot be seen, touched or heard. Since all law is contract, the system operates against you on the basis of presumption that you have contractually agreed that your "straw man"- your name appearing in all capital letters, the name in which all industrial goods and services come to you - is their exclusive property.
3. Government and commercial law can deal only against fictitious entities (persons, artificial persons) and the documents creating them, such as corporations, trusts, certificates of title, birth certificates, etc., and contracts involving same. Such persons include your all-capital letter name, i.e. your straw man, which also happens to be what is called a "corporation sole" (an incorporation of yourself). The Real Parties of Interest who own the law and money, and the agencies/resources of essentially all of the world's governments, created your straw man shortly after your birth. Since they created and presumed ownership of your straw man they can tax, regulate and destroy their property as they see fit. The real you, i.e. your living, sentient, biological being is indivisibly united with your fictitious name, straw man person, as the ego is inextricably united with the organism. The straw man includes your ego and the words, concepts, thoughts and ideas with which you interact with other people in speaking or writing. That which is done to the straw man is transmitted/transferred to the being linked thereto.
4. A sovereign possesses full right to dispense with his own property in any manner he wishes. If the sovereign Elite who own the straw man with which you are contractually presumed to have become unified, elect to tax, fine, regulate, enslave, or kill the abstract straw man; then, you, the physical/biological being, experience the consequences in reality. In such a legal status you are devoid of capacity to assert/enforce any rights. You have no "standing in law". A slave cannot sue his master/owner.
5. When you secure ownership of your straw man in accordance with the legal procedures required to do so, you reunite your inherent Rights and Title to Rights (which are innate, unalienable and never leave you) with the Certificate of Title to Rights. In such case you have all claim on your straw man. In such case no other being in the universe has any claim11 on your straw man. In such case all other entities are devoid of capacity to act against you or any property you have thus secured.
6. The commercial crux of the matter is: WHO OWNS YOUR STRAW MAN? Unless you legally own your straw man, officials of the system possess the right in law, i.e. deadly violence, to treat you in any manner the system mandates or allows, because the system owns your straw man. On the other hand, if you own your straw man no one in government, or anywhere else, can "state a claim" upon which relief can be granted", i.e. no one can penetrate your universe legally or commercially. They are estopped12ab initio.13
7. Presumption of contractual ownership of your straw man by the system is the basis of the system's claim against you. When you legally dissolve the presumption of contract between you and their ownership of your straw man, the basis of the government's claim on you is removed and you are legally established as sovereign and free.
8. Regain the legal capacity14(key word) of a sovereign and you have standing in law to assert your rights presumption and can successfully rebut the foundational presumption of law by which the entire legal system functions. That presumption of law is that you have - as a free-will sovereign exercising your power of free choice - knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily contracted to be bound with, and thereby be subject to, the system. If you can properly rebut the presumption of bondage you are free; if you fail to do so your failure is a legal default (agreement by silence), signifying agreement with the position of the system that you are indeed a slave.
9. The rules are self-enforcing. The law is self-supporting. If you use the law improperly (which includes failure to use it at all) you lose by default. If you use the rules properly, you not only win but place the entirety of the law enforcement machinery of the world on your side instead of against you.
II. Current status and how it came about
A. A land mark Supreme Court case of 1795, Penhallow vs. Doane's Administrators, defines governments succinctly: "governments are corporations". Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, a creature of the mind only, a government can deal only with artificial persons. The imaginary, having no real substance, cannot create or attain parity with the real. The legal aspect of this is that no government, or any law, agency, aspect, or court thereof, can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them. One might immediately dispute this statement by pointing out that people are acted upon by agents of governments and fined, imprisoned, plundered and killed by government officials every day. The reason this can occur in law is due to the following:
1. The Powers That Be, who know and use the law, have stolen, conquered, subjugated and laid claim to the planet and the six billion people on it by using a foundational and inviolable axiom of law:
"An unrebutted affidavit, claim, or charge (no matter how preposterous
criminal, or illegitimate) stands as the truth in commerce".
2. The maxim cited above is necessarily true because unless what is asserted is rebutted or disputed by the affected party there is no basis for anyone to know or act in any manner contrary to the unrebutted/undisputed claim or charge. This is a free-will universe. The unit of experience, rights and sovereignty is each particular man. No one in the universe can speak for you other than you - including rebutting or disputing a presumption. As per the famous quote in Longfellow's Courtship of Miles Standish; "Why don't you speak for yourself John [Alden]". This is the basis of the ancient maxim of law: "He who fails to assert his rights has none".
3. The government acts against the artificial person that the government creates and owns. The real being is acted upon because of presumption that the real being has knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily contracted to be unified or identified with the artificial person owned by the RPOI for whom the government fronts as a RP11. If you do not rebut the presumption, it stands as the truth and the judgment of the law.
4. The above-referenced presumed contract of the system's ownership of your straw man is considered valid because you have failed to dispute the presumption of a contractual nexus - thereby agreeing - and you lose by default. Or, worse yet, you expressly ratify the contract by action or written assent. To accept any benefit from the system is to contractually incur the obligations associated therewith.
5. Examples of contract ratification are:
a. Ratification by act (implied contract) occurs in a restaurant when you order and consume a meal. You have, by your actions and without signing a written contract, contractually agreed to pay for the meal.
b. Ratification by express contract with government occurs wherever anyone signs a form or application to accept any government benefit or privilege, such as driving a car, welfare, food stamps, unemployment insurance, etc. One who accepts the contractual benefits simultaneously incurs the contractual obligations. In the case of contracts with government, the obligations you incur are decided wholly by the government.15
III. Foundational instrument/contract and how to eliminate its claim on you
A. The fact that all human interactions, commerce and law is contract means that all actions of the officials or agents of any government, without exception, derive from presumption of an express, implied, or presumed contract. The key issues are:
 

1. What is the ultimate, central core contractual instrument embodying or evidencing the certificate of title to yourself and your body, labor and property whereby the holder of said instrument may be deemed in law to hold title to, i.e. own, your straw man?
2. By what means in law can any presumed contract of ownership of your straw man (by the system) be effectively rebutted, disputed and rendered null and void?
3. How can you become the sovereign owner, the "holder in due course16" of your straw man and the above- referenced instrument?
4. What is your capacity and standing in law if you fail to be established as the owner of your straw man and the above-referenced instrument?
5. What is your capacity and standing in law if you are established as the owner of your straw man and the above-referenced instrument?

B. The answer to the first question: the identity of the foundational instrument constituting certificate of title to your being, life, rights, faculties, labor and property in open-ended perpetuity, is your Birth Certificate. Your Birth Certificate is the Certificate17 of Title to your straw man, alluded to above. It is essentially a Certificate of Deed to yourself. Literally and legally, it is a warehouse receipt, a bill of lading, FOB18 the hospital of birth.

C. Ever since the Declaration of Independence the world powers (kings, popes and money changers) have operated unceasingly to obtain full control, ownership and subjugation of the U.S.A. and the American People. To date they have succeeded in great measure. The weakness of their scheme is that their operations have been founded on deceit and rebuttable/disputable presumptions and will not stand the test of genuine scrutiny, i.e. the full light of day. Their entire operation dissolves when the presumptions on which they function are correctly rebutted, which is the purpose of the procedure which is outlined in this synopsis. The strength of their position is that the American People in particular, and the people of the world in general, live in ignorance and apathy, give away their power and freedom and have thereby defaulted themselves into slavery.
D. Remembering the foundational premise that all law is contract, the would-be Rulers of the World have "succeeded" by making us contractually subject to their rulership/ownership. As per the maxim of law, "as a thing is bound, so it is unbound", the same rules that made us slaves can make us free. The rules are the rules are the rules. The legal consequences to our lives are exclusively a function of our use of the rules.
E. Increasing numbers of people are becoming aware that the "contract" of the presumed nexus between a man and the government that rules him is structurally defective. Per universal contract law, in order for a contract to be valid, i.e. a contract at all, it must be formulated in accordance with specific fundamentals. Most fundamentally, contract is the formalization and codification of an agreement. In order to achieve agreement, all parties must understand the full scope and nature, the full terms and conditions, of the proposed contract, or no agreement - and hence no contract - exists. Parties must achieve a "meeting of the minds" for any agreement to exist. People enter into contracts in order to be bettered in their own terms. No one enters into a contract to be diminished, cheated or destroyed. Any purported "contract" that fails to be characterized by mutual good faith, meeting of the minds, open and full disclosure of all terms and conditions, is either void or voidable. It is flawed from inception and can be rendered null and void by the election of the deceived or defrauded party.
F. The Texas Civil Code sets forth contract law in §§ 1549, et seq. Some crucial sections are:
§ 1550. Essential elements of contract
It is essential to the existence of a contract that there should be:

1. Parties capable of contracting [capacity];
2. Their consent;
3. Lawful object; and,
4. A sufficient cause or consideration.
§ 1556. Who may contract
1. All persons are capable of contracting, except minors, persons of unsound mind, and persons deprived of civil rights.

§ 1565. Essentials of consent
The consent of the parties to a contract must be:

1. Free;
2. Mutual; and,
3. Communicated by each to the other.
§ 1567. An apparent consent is not real or free when obtained through:
1. Duress;
2. Menace;
3. Fraud;
4. Undue influence; or
5. Mistake
G. The crucial and incurable flaw in all governments and the "laws" which issue therefrom, is the nonexistence of genuine agreement between the parties due to absence of full disclosure, true meeting of the minds and mutual good faith. In presuming to have formed a bona fide, good faith contract with a government, the "citizens" were never informed of the full terms and conditions of the alleged contract. They were never told that they would be sacrificing their freedom and autonomy and agreeing to become the subjugated, ruled, exploited slaves of whatever men occupy positions of "authority" in the so-called "government". The reason this situation exists is because the people have deluded themselves, lied to themselves and failed to communicate and be sincere with themselves. The outer world of human law and governments is merely the effect of what the people themselves have caused. Do not blame the messenger for the message. H. In accordance with timeless and universal principles of contract law; in the absence of genuine agreement no contract exists. At best, there can be only a presumption of contract based on the deceived party having been kept in the dark, being ignorant of the truth, or having foolishly trusted in the other party. When one fails to object to, i.e. rebut, the presumption that a contract exists, it may, perforce, rightfully be assumed or construed that a contract does indeed exist.
I. Although fraud is always unlawful, it is not illegal in state rulership systems. The rationale for to one may assent19 to fraud. More seriously, all governments are necessarily, structurally and inherently fraudulent, and cannot be otherwise. It is therefore self evident that fraud must be legal in order for a government to be able to self-adjudicate itself as legal even to exist. In other words, to assent to the existence of a government is to assent to the legality of fraud.19
J. Remember the cardinal, central principle on the basis of which the Powers That Be have stolen and enslaved the world: "An unrebutted claim, charge, or affidavit stands as the truth in commerce". Failure to rebut is agreement by silence; nothing is on the table for discussion other than the unrebutted claim. Another fundamental maxim of commercial law is crucial: "A matter must be expressed to be resolved". Only each unique, autonomous being has the knowledge, right, or duty to affirm his truth. No one else can do it for him or is obligated to try. In fact, doing so is unlawful, inasmuch as only a man himself can speak for himself.
K. In commercial law the ultimate owner of an instrument is called the "holder in due course" (HDC)...the only one who possesses a valid claim. A "holder" may legally possess the instrument, but lacks the ultimate claim held by the HDC. To be a HDC requires that the "...holder ...took it for value, in good faith, and without notice of any claim or defense against it, and who can enforce the instrument free from all claims and personal defenses... A holder does not become a holder in due course of an instrument by... purchasing it as part of a bulk transaction not in the regular course of business or the transferor". As stated earlier, our Birth Certificate is a warehouse receipt. Birth certificates are bundled together and transferred or purchased in bulk. Moreover, this purchase and transfer is "not in the regular course of business of the transferor", i.e. you! In addition, possession was not taken "in good faith" and the holder cannot "enforce the instrument free from all claims and personal defenses". This means that whoever acts as if he owned your Birth Certificate can be only a holder of it and can never be the actual holder in due course. The HDC is the most powerful position in any exchange. When you understand when you are and when you are not the HDC of an instrument or transaction, and apply it, your whole life will change. You are sovereign and untouchable with respect to anything of which you are the HDC. Why not be the HDC of yourself, all your affairs, and everything else concerning which you wish to be the actual owner?
L. The entire matter is profound. Just as all of manifest existence was created by thought, all our thoughts - and words - create. All that we are, and everything we experience, we created by thought. Thought is destiny. "Be careful what you wish for - you may get it". Since everything we experience is the product of thought, what value inheres in fighting, resisting, running, or hiding from the natural-law effects of what we ourselves caused? No one can escape from himself. Man's fundamental problem is that he deals with effects while ignoring their causes. A major reason for this is the time interval between causing an event and experiencing its effect. Birth is not instantaneous with conception; harvest does not occur at the instant the seed is planted. Intermediate natural law processes are vast and inexorable.
M. Our entire legal situation is the playing out of the laws of existence. When the Bible states: "Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and all these things shall be added unto you", it is stating in devotional or theological terms what stated by Lao-tzu in existential terms". "The source of life is as a mother. Be fond of both mother [source] and children [creations] but know the mother dearer and you outlive death. Curb your tongue and senses and you are beyond trouble; let them loose and you are beyond help20." The point is that "normal life" consists of attempt to acquire by grant, theft, grasping, physical labor, or some other external effort, ownership of a manifest thing (the outward expression of an inner, unmanifest cause). This is being fond of the children instead of the mother. We can truly own something only when we are one with what we desire at its source (the "Kingdom of God" or "source of live", the true reality and unmanifest origin of our manifest selves). If we act "out there" in the realm of some phase of the vast set of natural - law processes which mechanically and heartlessly carry out "cause and effect", we can never truly fulfill our desire. This is falling for, i.e. becoming absorbed in, the Wizard's light show, which is a chimera21 and alien to us.
N. The key to becoming the HDC is "Acceptance for Value". The fact that your Birth Certificate is held in limbo by parties who can never be the HDC of it means that it is in suspense awaiting your redemption of it. "Redemption" has been defined (in part) as: "Deliverance from the power of alien domination and the enjoyment of the resulting right or interest". You achieve union of "effect" and "cause" simply by accepting that which already belongs to you. That only you, and you alone, can become the HDC and do so is the evidence of your exchange of value. This completes the circle, renders you owner and holder in due course of the entire matter. Such an action redeems the process from "alien (phenomena, appearance, illusion, maya, natural-law processes outside of yourself) dominion".
O. When an offer is made, title passes upon acceptance of the offer. This meeting of the minds =agreement = contract. All that remains is to give evidence of the exchange.

P. The Department of Commerce accepted your Birth Certificate from your mother, who unwittingly pledged you to the State and delivered you into bondage, slavery, and the status of being chattel property in permanently indentured servitude. The Department of Commerce became the de facto holder of the Certificate of Rights to you and you body, labor, and property and gave you a claim check. Whoever the holder of your Birth Certificate became the de facto22 holder of the Certificate of Rights to you and your body, labor, and property and gave you a claim check. Whoever the holder of your Birth certificate may how be has no more right to it than someone holding a possession for you in your absence and waiting for you to come back and claim it, to redeem it. The current holder of your Birth Certificate is able to capitalize on it because of your inaction and silence, i.e. your failure to instruct said holder otherwise. "While the cat's away the mice will play". When you, as the king, abnegate your throne to your underlings they run amuck. When you reclaim ownership of your Birth Certificate by accepting it for value, you regain your crown - you reinstall yourself on your own throne. You regain dominion and sovereignty over your own kingdom. The Wizard (alleged real Party of interest, pretender to the throne) and all your underlings (bureaucrats) are banished from power. You cannot obtain this condition by earning, fighting, or running. No one but you can give you back your own throne. Arguing or fighting = assenting. The only issue is then...how much??
Q. There are only two classes of people in the world and in any legal proceeding: Creditor and Debtor. When your sovereignty is established in law you become the Creditor and any adverse party (the Debtor in any dispute with you. If you fail to establish your sovereignty in law, you do not own yourself, have no legal capacity and are devoid of standing to assert any rights. You remain a permanent debtor, and must always lose in any dispute with the system for "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted". Reclaiming ownership of your straw man acts as a bar, or estoppel23 to any and all comers. If you fail to establish your sovereignty in law, you do not own yourself, have no legal capacity, and are devoid of standing to assert any rights. You remain a permanent debtor and must always lose in any dispute with the system for "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted". Reclaiming ownership of your straw man acts as a bar, or estoppel to any and all comers. If you fail to reclaim rights to title of your straw man by filing a UCC-1 Lien24, making you the creditor and absolute ruler of your straw man, you are not sovereign and you will lose at resolution of any dispute. This is why, if you contemplate hiring an attorney to represent (re-present) you in any legal proceeding against the system, ask him if he can make you the HDC of the action. If he cannot (which he cannot), then you will lose. The best any attorney can do is make a deal, which is a compromise (how much) rather than a clear win. You must be the HDC to be able to ensure victory.
IV. Explanation of procedures - why the process works.
1. There is no lawful money in circulation today. What passes as money - the medium of exchange, currency, legal tender - is private commercial paper evidencing the debt of the citizens of a county to pay on the collective bankruptcy of their government. Real money is substance (gold, silver, tangible produce of the earth, including labor); it cannot be debt. Citizen = bankrupt = legal incapacity = no rights to title to anything = no ownership of self or property = no rights to own, use and pass real money. Use of real money is the right of sovereigns, not slaves. This is why House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192 25, June 5, 1933 also known as Public Law 73-10, in declaring the bankruptcy of the U.S. states:
"That ... every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy ..."26
This rendered every "citizen of the United States" civilly dead in the law. It barred the way back to the Eden of sovereignty, power to enforce one's rights, access to the common law, etc. It left everyone bound to the ever-shifting mirages of endless hypothecations against one's straw man over which no one had a claim.

2. Debt is created by signature, by signing notes of indebtedness. All "money" in circulation today is created from thin air by borrowing against the collective (federal) bankruptcy. Only by borrowing against a government's bankruptcy can its citizens/slaves have pieces of paper ("Monopoly money)27 to spend like money.
3. Unless one is the HDC of one's straw man, "owning" such debt money or anything it buys is a liability and not an asset. The fact that people mistakenly consider FRNs (Federal Reserve Notes) to be assets (the more of them one acquires the "richer" one is) is a major cause of the problem. When one accumulates FRNS, one is accumulating debt. The more FRNs, the more industrial goods and services acquired with them, the more indebted one is.
4. Since all money is created by borrowing against a nation's collective bankruptcy by signature...every time you sign your name to any public document, or contract, or instrument involving FRNs as the "valuable" consideration, you borrow against (increase) your own debt. By increasing your borrowing and indebtedness you provide yourself with more debt instruments to "spend". This is akin to a slave in permanent indentured servitude who commits himself ever deeper in debt every time he borrows from his master in order to have scrip to use to purchase goods and services at the plantation commissary.
5. Since all money is created by borrowing against the collective bankruptcy of the corporate United States, it is mathematically impossible to ever pay off the debt. The only money available must be borrowed into existence. Thus, any "money" one acquires to "pay" on the debt would be obtained by borrowing, i.e. increasing the very debt one was attempting to liquidate. This is a never-ending, ever-worsening situation. To see the principle in action, examine the rate of increase of the National Debt.
6. When you establish your sovereignty and self ownership in law via a UCC-1 Financing Statement, your entire life is dramatically affected. You become the HDC, i.e. the sovereign, rather than a hopeless debtor and chattel property. The controversy, fighting, arguing, dodging, makeshifts, paying and fear are over.
V. Summary
1. The State (in any aspect, any jurisdiction, any country, any culture, any time) can act against your straw man only if said State holds title to it by virtue of your failure to redeem it. Your failure constitutes assent to the presumption that the State is the de facto owner and holder of title to your straw man.
2. The most powerful contract in the world is a UCC-1 Financing Statement. impenetrable, and the foundation of all commerce.
3. The Financing Statement currently in place against your life, your labor and all your property was established by illegitimate presumption. That you fail to rebut the presumption is the reason you are in the mess you are today.
4. The security instrument is your Birth Certificate. The bankers presently hold title. You are the collateral. This can happen only by omission/failure to rebut their presumption.
5. The bankers have conquered and enslaved the world only because of the ignorance, apathy and default of each slave. This is a freewill universe. The unit of experience, choice, rights and sovereignty is each individual. You are the only being in the universe with either the right, knowledge, power, or duty to speak for yourself; no one else can assert your rights for you. If you fail to assert your rights, you have tacitly agreed to be a slave, subject to the shims of your masters.
6. It is of the utmost importance to understand that the bankers' claim of ownership of title to your straw man via your Birth Certificate is by presumption only, and stands only because of your failure to rebut it. Filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement against your straw man absolutely rebuts any presumption of claim to your straw man by anyone other than you; while, at the same time, being itself unrebuttable. There are many reasons for this - the most crucial being:
a. Any substantiation of a bona fide contract between you and the usurpers of your throne is impossible because there never was a bona fide contract due to absence of true agreement based upon the interaction being devoid of full disclosure, genuine meeting of the minds and mutual good faith.
b. You are, and are correctly presumed in law (all law, including theirs), to be the foundation, origin, and unit of sovereignty. Whatever you choose to do or not to do is presumed to be done or not to be done by choice. If you fail to rebut their presumption that you are subject to their system they possess the grounds to presume that you chose to act as you did, with knowledge of the law28, in the freewill manner that you did. Conversely, the same philosophy that has worked against you can work for you when you rebut their presumption and redeem your sovereign capacity. Approximately six billion people are ex-sovereigns who have, by their sovereign act of non-action (default), made themselves slaves on a slave plantation of which they are the rightful owners.29
7. You dispute/rebut the presumption of validity of the bankers' claim against you by filing, in your biological, sovereign capacity, a UCC-1 Financing Statement in the office of any State Secretary of State claiming title to your straw man. You also secure all other government-issued documents and all other items you wish to maintain dominion over, under your UCC-1 Financing Statement...the system can perfect no claim against your straw man or any of the secured property. 8. A subject/slave has no capacity to assert any rights; and, the system has the contractual, legal right to treat you any way it chooses. A sovereign holds sovereign title to his property. If you reclaim self ownership neither the bankers, nor anyone else in existence, can perfect any claim against you.
9. In law one is either a complete slave (debtor) or unalloyed sovereign (creditor). There is no middle ground. All actions other than elimination of the false presumption of ownership of you leaves you still subject to the claim. Anything (such as the huge maize and light show of governments, courts and regular "law") other than the elimination of the illegitimate presumption of ownership of you.
10. The usual question asked immediately is: "Since they are criminals, what is to prevent them from disregarding your legal processes and acting against you anyway?" Some of the reasons are:
a. The Powers That Be attained their current conquest/rulership of the world after having meticulously scrutinized the law continuously over many millennia. The purpose of this was to make everything they did legal.
b. Like a coin, every aspect of manifest existence has two sides. This includes all laws, rules and regulations. If any laws are utilized in one way (such as against you by your default) they can also be used in the opposite way (such as to your advantage by your correct use of them).
c. A timeless, universal maxim of law states: "The law always provides a remedy". They must leave you a way out, or blow all cover of legitimacy and legal authority. In such case they announce that they are merely thugs and provide you with full right in law from time immemorial to self-defense. In such case, all law, including "thou shalt not kill", is suspended by the law of necessity, i.e. survival.
d. No tyrant can rule without the broad-based consent of the people. Power always has and always will reside in the people. People become slaves because they choose to give their power away rather than retain it. If a sufficient number of people in a country become aware of the truth and reclaim/assert their power, no tyrant can achieve and maintain a rulership position.
e. The laws of commerce are now inviolate and established throughout the world. Even martial law is subordinate to commercial law.
11. Once you have filed a UCC-1 Financing Statement establishing the real sovereign, you as the Secured Party have exclusive claim on your straw man. You are then "first line and first in time". You work in tandem with your straw man and no one can get to either of you. This renders you legally sovereign, free and immune from all claims and charges. 12. The reason this scenario prevails is that the world has been set up to run precisely this way. We (the slaves) were just not supposed to figure it out. Before the bankruptcy, men and women sovereigns were personally accountable for their actions in courts which were set up to accommodate disputes among sovereigns (such as the original common law in England before 1066). Now, the people's straw men, who are legally owned property of the system, are the "accountable parties" as adjudicated and enforced by the system. Such formerly sovereign men and women are now personally acceptable because they are inextricably joined (by implied contract) with their straw men. Courts today are set up to deal only with straw men. We, their unfortunate counterparts, are merely "along for the ride". A sovereign (real being) has no place in a contemporary court (commercial, dealing in artificial persons), and cannot be legally accommodated. Only if the current debt-based system of finance and government is rectified will we ever get back to a sane and just basis for resolution of disputes and a sound civilization.
 
 


VI. PRACTICAL SUGGESTIONS
1. Those intending to actualize this program would benefit from forming discussion/study groups. This helps with mutual understanding. True understanding of what you are doing is essential because, after all, you are the self-accountable sovereign responsible for your own actions and you must be able to substantiate in law what you are doing.
2. Make your spiritual life preeminent: "Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you". Or, as a great Indian sage state the matter: "Seek the highest first". This means, inter alia, to maintain your integrity and scrupulously ethical behavior. In practice, this requires that you keep your word, honor your contracts, and never depart from your principles.
Man's fundamental folly is the illusion that he can cheat moral or natural law (usually by trying to cheat others) and get away with it. Every such attempt generates inexorable cause effect consequences, all man's laws and cleverness to the contrary notwithstanding. Indeed, the entirety of our predicament is due to failure to live in harmony/accordance with moral and natural law. The current system is the cause/effect result of actualizing our own folly. Government can be accurately defined as "the aggregate irresponsibility of a people".
---------------------
Notes:
1 A difference exists between the meaning of "define" and "definition". The word "define" is precise and limiting, while "definition" is loose and malleable.

2 Sovereign: that which is preeminent among all others.
 

3 Caveat: Latin, let him beware. In general a warning or emphasis for caution.
4 Straw man: Law, a "front"; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction in name only.
5 What you do know cannot hurt you because you can use your knowledge of the truth to "set yourself free". What you do not know, however, can kill you. Ignorance is not bliss. . .it is suicide.
6 A good source is West Publishing company at (800) 328-9352..
7 Some of the States which are readily accepting the UCC-1 filings at this writing include Oregon, Washington, Texas, Indiana, Ohio and Minnesota. Texas and Nevada have been uncooperative. The situation is in a state of flux and no one can predict the future behavior of the bureaucrats. Every Secretary of State must, by law, file your submissions. Failure to do so renders the party who refused to file your UCC-1 guilty of a criminal act and an interference with commerce, thereby making the offending party subject to prosecution in his/her personal (nonofficial) capacity.
8 No penalties or sanctions exist for submitting a filing that is not correctly executed. It is simply returned, usually with an explanation of the error so that you can correct it.
9 Ego: The "I" or self of any person; a person as thinking, feeling and willing, and distinguishing itself from the selves of others and from objects of its thought.
10 In law, a "person" is not flesh and blood, but artificial - a creature of contract, i.e. the contractual aspect of a real being, such as a "citizen", "driver" or an "officer of a corporation".
11 The word "claim" is defined in law as "dispute over title". WHO OWNS YOU?
12 Estop: To stop, bar or impede: to prevent to preclude.
13 Ab initio: from the first act, from the beginning
14 Capacity: Ability, qualification; legal power or right.
15 Such a wholesale contract with a government is called an "adhesion contract". See Glossary. It is structured and enforced per the discretion of the stronger party (government). A citizen contracts to buy a bill of goods.
16  Holder in Due Course: the one who holds the only valid claim to something; the ultimate owner of a document of title.
17  A "certificate" of title is not title. It is a notice or statement that title exists somewhere. All innate rights are unalienable (un-a-lien-able" i.e. unable to be liened) Being that which exists possesses by its mere existence the right to be itself; and the title to that right. Presumptions to the contrary are imaginary, hypothetical and abstract. Grammatically, such presumptions should be expressed in the subjunctive case, i.e. "as if".
18  FOB: Free on board: Commercial term signifying an agreement between buyer and seller whereby the subject of the sale will be delivered to a designated place, usually either the place of shipment or the destination, at no expense to the buyer.
19 In law, there is a difference between "assent" and "consent". One may 'assent' to fraud, e.g. governments, by non-rebuttal.
One cannot 'consent' to fraud; however, because 'consent' requires actual agreement - true meeting of the minds, full disclosure and good faith..

20 Every word you utter is a commercial presentment, a straw man, if you will, and a contractual act - an offer that can either be accepted or rejected. This can result when in court and the judge asks an off-point question. By answering, you form a contract with the judge that is different than the matter which brought you into court. Ignorance of how to deal with such trickery can land you in jail.
21 Chimera: A vain or idle fancy
22 De Facto: In fact, in deed, actually. This phrase is used to characterize an officer, a government, a past action, or a state of
affairs, which must be accepted for all practical purposes, but is illegal or illegitimate.

23 Estoppel: An admission of so conclusive a nature that the party whom it affects is not permitted to aver [declared, asset, allege] against it or offer evidence to controvert it.
24 The UCC-1 Financing Statement is the only unbreakable contract in the world. It is the ultimate foundation, the bedrock upon which the world's commerce functions.
25 House Joint Resolution 192: June 5, 1933, Public Law 73-10. Following the bankruptcy of the U.S., the government outlawed the payment of debts in gold or silver and provided only for the "discharge" of debts in "legal tender", i.e. Federal Reserve Notes, or permanently unfulfilled, irredeemable evidences of debt, private commercial scrip, "fiat" money (money by decree).
26 "Public Policy" = "Federal Reserve reinsurance policy". Every time a budget is passed by a government legislature, or assets pledged or hypothecated (which happens billions of times a day in the world), existing policies are reinsured. Commerce, existing in admiralty, is in a state of perpetual flux ever changing like waves of the ocean.
27 Monopoly: Board game paralleling banker philosophy of bankrupting all others and monopolizing all wealth.
28 Remember: "All are equal under the law", and "ignorance of the law is no excuse".
29 The movie: The Wizard of Oz, dramatized the scenario for the whole world to see in living Technicolor.
The artificial aspect of you, your straw man, has no brain; the commercial process by which the entire scenario functions, the tin man has no heart, i.e. no mercy, the biological aspect of you, the lion (king of beasts), has no courage. The result is falling for the grand illusion, a colossal "light show", projected by an ordinary man (the Wizard) from behind the scenes. How do you find the Wizard? Follow the yellow brick road. What kind of bricks are yellow? The movie screamed the message, hit us upside the head with it like a two-by-four. Follow the money trail. What is the end of the trail? The Wizard is another sovereign man just like you (only considerably more clever and unscrupulous). 



 RELATED LINKS



 YOUTUBE 



 TWITTER

Do We Understand Freedom, or Fear It?



Do We Understand Freedom, or Fear It?
by Jesse Enloe
How could we understand it? We've never had it!
Most everyone alive today has never experienced freedom as intended by God and by those who founded the united States of America and those who founded the Republic of Texas.
I know that you are told that you live in a
free country. I submit to you that what that means today is that the government is free to do anything it chooses TO the people rather than the people being free to do what they chose.
If you think that this is the craziest thing you ever heard, I challenge you to read on. In the end, you may not agree, but I challenge you to THINK about what is said here.
The erosion of liberty has come very slowly but ever so steadily, beginning almost at the very foundation of America. The Bill of Rights was added to the U.S. Constitution only two years after it was written. Why was this necessary? Because some of those in "power" early on wanted to regulate the people and pass laws to control their behavior. Fortunately, there were those who remembered what the revolutionary war was all about: Freedom from Government control of the people. So the Bill of Rights was added to be an eternal reminder to the Government of the Rights of the people, that they had NO AUTHORITY to tread on. That means that they have no right, no delegated authority, to tread on the PEOPLE or their RIGHTS!!
What is a Constitution?
A Constitution is a common-law document that is written by the people to create a body of government to serve their interests. There are certain things that a government can do for the people that it would be difficult for them to do for themselves. For instance, it is more expedient for representatives of the people to make treaties and trade agreements with foreign countries, rather than each individual having to do this. Of course, the interests of the people should always be uppermost in the minds of those who make the agreements.
My favorite (related) story is of the man who was asked, "What do you want your government to do for you?" His reply: "Guard the shores, deliver the mail, and leave me the heck alone!" Expresses my sentiments perfectly.
A Constitution delegates responsibility and authority from the people to the Government. We must understand the principle, which is a maxim of law, that one can only delegate authority that one possesses. Can any one person dictate to you what you should do or not do? Can two people get together and dictate to you what you should do or not do? Can 20 million people get together and tell you what to do? The answer is NO, not if you are actually free.
What about my "Constitutional Rights?" You don't have any such thing. Our rights were given to us by our Creator and the people who wrote the constitution knew that. That's why they had the right to write the constitution. The "Bill of Rights" was added to protect the rights the people already had. There is not one provision in the Constitution that allows anyone to take our rights; in fact it specifically restricts the Government from doing so. You see, the Constitution applies only to the Government, not to the people.
If we got our rights from the government or from the people, whoever gave them to us would be able to take them away. I totally reject the idea that anyone can take my rights away, with only one exception. If I harm another individual in some way and have a trial by a jury of peers, I could loose whatever rights they determined. Notice I said trial by jury, not trial with a jury or "jury trial." More about this later.
People do not possess the authority assign or remove the rights of another, or to dictate to or control the behavior of one another. Therefore, they cannot delegate such authority to a government. So why do we have a MASSIVE government composed of a myriad of administrative agencies that exist for one purpose and one purpose only: CONTROL! And who do they control? "We the people" - in ALL phases of life. The control extends from the cradle to the grave. I could write for the rest of my life giving examples of this control, but each person needs to learn to look, to see, and to think about what is going on.
In 1917 Congress passed a law called "The Trading With The Enemy Act." Its design was to regulate all those in the United States who were from a country considered to be an enemy of the U.S. The regulation was to extend to all phases of their personal and business life through licensing.
Here is how license is defined in Bouvier's Law Dictionary in the mid 1800's:
LICENSE, contracts. A right given by some competent authority to do an act, which without such authority would be illegal.
LICENSE, International law. An authority given by one of two belligerent parties, to the citizens or subjects of the other, to carry on a specified trade.
2. The effects of the license are to suspend or relax the rules of war to the extent of the authority given. It is the assumption of a state of peace to the extent of the license...
How did the things that the people have an inherent, God-given right to do come to require a license? In March of 1933, the Trading with the Enemy Act was revised to INCLUDE the American people simply by removing the phrase that EXCLUDED the American people. Thus the American people are now licensed to do just about everything. If this doesn't bother you, go back and re-read the above definitions of license. [For more on this I refer you to War and Emergency Powersand Constitution, Fact or Fiction? authored by Dr. Eugene Schroeder and others.]
Let's just look at one situation with which almost everyone is familiar. The Driver's License. When one applies for a Driver's License he enters a contract. He trades his inherent, God-given right to travel for a PRIVILEGE issued by the State. He agrees, by contract, to follow the Corporate Ordinances of the Corporate State. These ordinances are specifically written to control Motor Vehicles and Transportation.
You have been taught that you "operate" a "motor vehicle" and that it is your "transportation." Let's look at a couple more definitions. By legal definition, transportation relates to the movement of goods and persons by carriers for hire. Section 521.001 of the Texas Transportation Code:
"Definitions (a) In this chapter (6) License means an authorization to operate a motor vehicle that is issued under or granted by the laws of this state. At Section 541.201. Vehicles in this subtitle (11) Motor vehicle means a self propelled vehicle..." and (22) Vehicle means a device that can be used to transport or draw persons or property on a highway. Therefore, a driver's license is required of one who is engaged in the commercial activity of operating a vehicle for the purpose of transportation of goods or persons for hire.
Did you go to a Motor Vehicle Dealership to purchase your motor vehicle? I suspect that you purchased (if it was new) from an AUTOMOBILE dealership. So when did your automobile become a "motor vehicle" used in "transportation?" When you applied for that designation by asking to have it registered "as a motor vehicle" the transition became reality.
And how are these "laws" enforced upon PEOPLE who have a RIGHT to travel without the government's permission? By CONTRACT. Remember a license is a contract. So why do we apply for such a license? Because everyone KNOWS that you have to have a license, because everyone says so. Remember in your history lessons that once upon a time everyone KNEW that the world was flat? Did that make it true?
A famous man once said:
"Power and the law are not synonymous. In truth they are frequently in opposition and irreconcilable. There is God's Law from which all equitable laws of man emerge and by which men must live if they are not to die in oppression, chaos, and despair. Divorced from God's eternal and immutable Law, established before the founding of the suns, man's power is evil no matter the noble words with which it is employed or the motives urged when enforcing it. Men of good will, mindful therefore of the Law laid down by God, will oppose governments whose rule is by men, and, if they wish to survive as a nation they will destroy that government which attempts to adjudicate by the whim or power of venal judges."
If a thorough study were done on every type of license, it would more than likely reveal more definitional tricks to make people think that they are "required" to have a license to do certain things, when in fact they are not. Remember, the government was not delegated the authority to regulate or control the behavior of PEOPLE. Rather, the Constitution was written to regulate and control the government.
Do we have any idea of the occupations requiring a License today? I'm sure there is a list somewhere. Let's see, there's Electrician, Plumber, Contractor, Real Estate, Insurance, Securities, Doctors, Lawyers, Accountants, Mechanics, people who sell, people who buy, and on and on ad nauseam. The restaurant has to have a license to sell you the food. Almost EVERY business in America has to have some kind of license.
Please show me in the Constitution where the Federal Government got the authority delegated from the people to require all these licenses. The facts are obvious. They do not have the LAWFUL authority to require anything of the people. It is the responsibility of the people to enforce the law against the government, not the other way around.
How do you steal the rights of the American people? It's like cooking a frog. If you throw a frog into boiling water its reflexes are so strong and fast that it will instantly remove itself from the pot. So you put it into a pot with lukewarm water and then slowly and steadily increase the heat. By the time it realizes it's being cooked, IT'S TOO LATE!
So, when the Trading With the Enemy Act was revised, they didn't all at once impose regulations on every area of our lives. They started slowly and then steadily increased them. Look at where you are today. You are free to do anything you want to do, as long as you fit into the system of things and have the government's permission first!
The Administrative Procedures Act
Another important event in America's history regarding loss of liberty was the creation of Administrative Agencies. When the "Administrative Procedures Act" was passed the House of Representatives issued a report on the legislative history of the act. There are some comments recorded in this report, House Report 1980 of May 3, 1946, that are quite revealing. It quotes the 1937 Report of President's Committee on Administrative Management: "The growth and intensification of administrative regulation of private enterprise and other phases of American life had moved President Roosevelt early in his administration to appoint a committee to study administrative methods?" I challenge ANYONE to show me a provision in the Constitution authorizing the "regulation of private enterprise and other phases of American life"!
There is, in fact, no such provision as evidenced in the report's quote from FDR: "At that time he also took occasion to remark that the practice of creating administrative agencies -- who perform administrative work in addition to judicial work, threatens to develop a fourth branch of the Government for which there is no sanction in the Constitution."
Now doesn't that make us feel comfortable!!! We go to school and we learn. We learn that "we have the best form of government in the world and that we enjoy the most freedom of any country in the world." And all along we are being ruled and subjugated by a fourth branch of government for which there is no sanction in the constitution!!
Folks, I did not make this up. These are the words of the great Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the man who revised the Trading With the Enemy Act and created the Administrative Agency concept.
It has been said: "The absolute worst form of slavery is for the slave who thinks he is free."
I feel truly sorry for those who believe that they are free and are not. They have lived their lives accumulating the "things" that evidence the "American Dream." All the while being deflected from the truth and participating in an illegal and unlawful system that requires registration for every activity and "permission" to do what they have a lawful, inherent right to do.
The Commercial World
Everything today is done in Commerce. In 1878 the UNITED STATES was incorporated and became a Corporation doing business in Commerce for a Profit. That means that the "Government" as it was created by the Constitution no longer exists. We have a Corporation posing as government and controlling all phases of our lives through the "fourth branch of government", the Administrative Agencies.
Originally Commerce was defined as substantial trade between countries and governmental entities. Now it means every transaction that involves "trade." So when you go to the grocery store and buy a gallon of milk you are involved in Commerce, by the "government's" definition. They use this twisted definition of words to give the appearance that they have the authority to regulate everything since the Constitution gave to the real government the authority to regulate commerce between the States.
To involve the people in the corporate commercial world they had to create artificial commercial identities for each of us. Have you ever noticed how your name is written on your Driver's License? Have you ever noticed that everything issued from the government uses the same format? Have you ever noticed how your name is written on almost every piece of mail you receive? They are writing "your name" in all capital letters.
Were you taught, when you went to school, that the proper way to write a proper name was in all capital letters? I've not found anyone yet that was taught this. We were taught to capitalize the first letter of proper names. Not the whole name. So why are all these documents using all capital letters? Is it accidental? Is everyone who works for the government making a mistake? Are the utility companies making the same mistake?
The answer is No; they are not making a mistake. It is intentional. What does it mean? The all-capital designation IS NOT YOUR NAME!! I realize that if this is the first time you have ever heard this, it sounds completely preposterous. But it is, in fact, true.
The all-capital name is the name of a FICTION AT LAW. I refer you to Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Edition for the exact definition of this term. A fiction at law, or legal fiction, is an artificially created entity that is only contemplated in law. In other words, it is not real except in the eyes of the law as written by men.
Legal fictions are the opposite of natural entities, such as people. A created legal fiction is endowed by the law to have some privileges that resemble the rights that people have, such as the right to hold property and to sue and be sued. The most common legal fictions are corporations and trusts. These have been around for quite some time and are now used exclusively for commercial purposes. In other words, you have to be a legal fiction to operate in commerce. So when you, a natural person, a living soul, buy that gallon of milk, the government's presumption is that it is the legal fiction, or Straw Man, buying the milk and you are acting as a surety for the Straw Man.
Straw man, as defined in Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition: A "front"; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct respecting the property. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser, or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed.
If you have ever purchased a home or other property, look at the mortgage papers and the deed for the all-capital name with the above definitions and information in mind. You will realize that you do not own the property, the Straw Man (Legal Fiction) does, and since the government created this fiction, they ultimately own the property.
We have been lulled, over the years, slowly but steadily, to accept an artificial, counterfeit society. And we have been blindly living in it and accepting its "benefits" all along.
So, Why Is This Important?
Personally, I don't believe we can understand the extent to which we have lost our liberties and freedoms, without understanding some of these things and having at least a limited concept of what is truly going on in the world around us. I think that we must first understand that we are not as free as we have been told and have believed, before we can even contemplate what true freedom is.
To me, true freedom, is living my life free from the regulation or control of any governmental body or anyone else. But we must realize a very powerful truth about freedom. You cannot have freedom without self-responsibility. If I have enough self-responsibility to control myself, I do not need anyone else to control me.
The problem with discussing true freedom is that we have been taught, subtly but effectively, to fear freedom. SAY WHAT? Think of a world where the people are not regulated by traffic laws. Would everyone want to drive 100 miles per hour or more everywhere they go? I don't believe responsible people would do that, but what about those that are not so responsible. Most people would say something like, "I don't want someone speeding around and killing ME!" Well, of course no one wants that. Does it happen today anyway? Of course it does.
You see, the laws that men have written DO NOT PREVENT CRIME. They only define crime and the punishment for it. Laws have never prevented one crime. I "love" the attitude of the people who say, after a tragedy, WE MUST PASS MORE LAWS!
Use the school shooting in Littleton, Colorado as an example. If the perpetrators of that horrible crime were willing to break every law that already existed to execute their crime, how many laws would it take to keep them from doing it?
In fact, here's an interesting thought: More laws create more crime. For example, when the Supreme Court ruled that God and Prayer to Him should be removed from school, they effectively made that concept into law. And what happened? The quality of education has been in steady decline and violence has been steadily increasing. Why?
Because it is not law that prevents crime. It is the morality of the heart of the individual or the fear of justice. These are the only things that prevent crime. People have always known that it was wrong to commit murder. Do we need a hundred different descriptions of degrees of murder and methods of murder to know that murder is wrong? No we do not. The common law, that law which is common to all people on the earth, is simply stated: Do not harm another or his/her property, and your word is your bond (which means honor your contracts [don't lie])
I submit that this is all the law we need.
Now, how is this law administered? By the people. A jury of 12 has been the accepted method of administering justice for hundreds if not thousands of years. Until this system was perverted by the "American Legal System" it worked quite sufficiently.
A jury of 12 possesses the authority, by true law, to determine what evidence they will hear, to determine the law, and to determine the facts. When we have this kind of jury, we can have a trial by jury. When a government judge, operating in commercial law, determines the law and the evidence to be heard, and tells the jury what it can and cannot do, we have a trial with a jury or what is commonly known today as a "jury trial." The former is due process, the latter is not.
When a jury was free from man made laws, prescribed punishments, and administrative (commercial) judges, they could administer justice. For example, a man steals a steak from the grocery store. He can be tried by the people who can rule that the man repay the store owner for the steak. If they choose to impose the Biblical punishment they can also mandate that the thief pay seven times the value of the steak. This would be true justice, compensation for the victim.
How does it work today? The man is issued a citation or tried and his punishment is to pay the city or the state for his crime. What does the owner of the store get? A big fat ZERO! The "government" gets rewarded for the crime. And they say crime doesn't pay. How many millions, no BILLIONS, has the "government" collected over the years at the expense of the victims of crime? We will probably never know.
But, I digress. Let's talk more about freedom. Once we get over our fear of allowing others to be free, we can begin to restore freedom in our land. You see, there is one other very simple truth that applies here. If I want to be free, I must be willing to let others be free. That means they can do anything they want to do, as long as they don't harm me. I must get over my fear of being harmed in order to allow others to be free, indeed to allow freedom to exist.
I must put my faith in the Common Law as given to us by our Creator. I must be able to know that true justice will be administered accurately and swiftly if I am harmed. In order to do this, we must be able to put the administration of justice where it belongs, in the hands of a jury of peers under the Common Law.
Another Definition:
Slave: A person who is wholly subject to the will of another; one who has no freedom of action, but whose person and services are wholly under the control of another. One who is under the power of a master, and who belongs to him; so that the master may sell and dispose of his person, of his industry, and of his labor, without his being able to do anything, have anything, or acquire anything, but what must belong to his master. (Blacks Law, 6th Ed.)
If you think this definition does not apply to you, you have never questioned or challenged the authority of a "government official." The degree to which the "master" will impose his will upon you is directly proportional to the degree to which you question or challenge their alleged authority.
Let's turn the definition of slave on its head and see what it would say:
Free man: An individual who is not subject to the will of another; one who has complete freedom of action, whose person and services are wholly under his own control. One who is NOT under the power of a master, and who belongs to himself; so he may dispose of his industry, and of his labor, and is able to do anything, have anything, or acquire anything, and it will belong to him in absolute ownership.
This narrative may not have convinced you that you are not free. If that is the case and you believe you are free, I have a simple challenge for you. Go out to your driveway and remove the government issued license plates from your automobile, remove the registration and safety inspection stickers from the windshield. Get in and start traveling to the destination of your choice. Let me know how far you got before being "detained" or arrested.
This paper is not about traffic laws, even though that is the example we have used. This is just one item that affects more people than most other "laws" and affects one of our most basic rights, the right to travel freely, without government regulation.
If you understand that you are not free, you may be asking the question, "How do we get our freedom back?" Once again, the answer is simple, but could be very difficult to implement. When the people start enforcing the law they wrote: the Constitution (it is said to be the law of the land, but is it?), against the government they created, we will begin to restore freedom.
The Declaration of Independence stated a very simple principle that any thinking person would agree with. It was, in fact, included in every Constitution written for Texas. "All Political Power Is Inherent In the people."
This is an inescapable fact. Whether the people exercise the power or not, it is with the people that the power resides. We can exercise our political power by remaining silent and allowing others to regulate and control our behavior, or we can exercise our political power by refusing to be regulated and controlled.
What would happen in Texas if every automobile (not commercial "vehicles") showed up on the street tomorrow without a license plate? How could they ticket or arrest millions of people at once?
What if everyone in the sovereign States did not file the unlawful income tax form next year. Could they prosecute a couple of hundred million people? (If you think that this tax is legal or lawful, you missed another deception).
So, the two fears we have to overcome are the fear of freedom, and the fear of the "government." Well I guess there's also the fear of all the boogymen the government has created. Overcoming our fears will be the beginning.
In summary, it is my opinion that we will once again become free after we work at understanding what freedom is and how we have lost it. When enough of us want to regain our freedom, we WILL DO IT.
Respectfully Submitted,
 

Jesse Enloe, President
Republic of Texas Provisional Government
http://texasrepublic.com
November 25, 1999
NOTE: I am a Citizen of the Republic of Texas. When I talk about our country I am talking about Texas. The U.S. has operated upon the deception and fraud that Texas is a State of the United States and perpetrated the same theft of liberties from the people of Texas as from the people of the sovereign States. What I have said in this narrative, however, applies to everyone who is under the thumb of the Corporate Federal U.S. "government".

 RELATED LINKS



 YOUTUBE 



 TWITTER

P R E S U M P T I O N: It's the Name of the Game



P R E S U M P T I O N: It's the Name of the Game
By Jesse Enloe
    Presumption is a word that we must understand in today's world. In fact, it is imperative that we understand it and how the "government" and its "courts" use the principle of presumption against the people.
    Presumption, as used in law, is a conclusion derived from a particular set of facts based on law, rather than probable reasoning. It is a rule of law which permits a court to assume a fact is true until such time as there is a preponderance (greater weight) of evidence, which disproves or outweighs (rebuts) the presumption. Each presumption is based upon a particular set of apparent facts paired with established laws, logic or reasoning.
    A presumption is rebuttable in that it can be refuted by factual evidence. One can present facts to persuade the judge that the presumption is not true.  Examples: a child born of a husband and wife living together is presumed to be the natural child of the husband, unless there is conclusive proof it is not;  a person who has disappeared and not been heard from for seven years is presumed to be dead, but the presumption could be rebutted if he/she is found alive;  an accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty [at least that's the way it used to be].  These are sometimes called rebuttable presumptions to distinguish them from absolute, conclusive or irrebuttable presumptions in which rules of law and logic dictate that there is no possible way the presumption can be disproved. However, if a fact is absolute it is not truly a presumption at all, but a certainty.
    Once a presumption is relied on by one party, however, the other party is normally allowed to offer evidence to disprove (rebut) the presumption. The presumption is known as a rebuttable presumption. In essence, then, what a presumption really does is place the obligation of presenting evidence concerning a particular fact on a particular party. [Emphasis added; my comments in brackets.]
    The above statements regarding presumption are taken from various law dictionaries and show us how presumption is defined in law and understood by the courts. To continue this discussion we must look at the nature of the "government" and the courts today and then look at the actual presumptions they rely upon regarding the people.
     In 1861 the legislators from the southern states walked out of congress and congress adjourned sine die,i.e.:with no time being set to reconvene. This effectively ended the Congress of the United States as established by the Constitution. The government of that day continued to operate, without a lawful congress in session, and literally POSED as the government rather than continuing as the lawful government of the United States. This problem has never been lawfully resolved; they still pose as the government. This is a radical statement, I know, but read on.
    The "United States", after it evaporated in 1861, was put back together by force of arms. We are constantly told that America was established as a country where the people are free. How does that square with the fact that the people have been FORCED into a political union by a war?  The fact is, it doesn't square up at all.
     In 1871, after the Civil War, congress passed the first act to allow the government to operate as a corporation. This was done under the guise of forming a government for the District of Columbia. The process was completed in 1878 by the final act allowing the "U.S. Government" to act as a corporation, operating in commerce for a profit. (From Statutes at Large)
     The people, as a whole, have never objected to the "government" operating as a corporation in commerce.  This, according to their legal definitions, validates the presumption that we accept the corporation of the UNITED STATES as the government of the United States.
     Since the "government" is a corporate entity operating in commerce, the courts which have been formed by the corporation and are a part of the corporation must, by operation of commercial law, be operating in commerce also. They are COMMERCIAL COURTS and not Courts of Law. Their jurisdiction and authority have been conferred upon them by a corporation that poses as the government.
     Corporations and commercial entities are legal fictions. They are created by man through man-made law and are the direct opposite of the natural creation of God, the people. The two cannot mix. A legal fiction can never become a natural living soul and a living soul can never become a legal fiction. The corporate government, therefore, had to create a "bridge" to bring the people under subjection to the corporation. So a legal fiction had to be created to represent each natural living soul in commerce.
     This legal fiction, by operation of commercial law, becomes a Straw Man for the living soul, represents him in commerce and the living soul becomes the surety for the Straw Man.
Straw man, as defined in Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition:A "front"; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct respecting the property. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser, or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed. [Emphasis added]
     Today the "government" operates on the presumption that all of us accept our role as surety for a legal fiction straw man because we validate their presumption on a daily basis by engaging in commerce (using Federal Reserve Notes) with the straw man as our representative.
     For the understanding of those that may be new to this entire concept: the Straw Man has a name that is different from yours, but still looks like it. Example: John Doe is presumed to be the surety for the legal fiction (straw man) JOHN DOE, which represents John in commercial transactions (every transaction involving the use of Federal Reserve Notes). Now, when you went to school were you ever taught to write a proper person's name in all capital letters? No? Then you are just like the rest of us. The proper English way to write the name of a proper person (living soul) is to capitalize the first letter and use lowercase letters for the rest of the name (e.g., John Doe). We were never taught to write people's names in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. Did the people in the courts go to a different school than we did? Are they uneducated? Are they all just making the same mistake? Or is this aberration intentional? I think this is the case.
     Anytime you see "your name" in all capital letters, IT IS NOT YOUR NAME!! It is the name of the legal fiction, which acts as a Straw Man representing you in commercial transactions and for which you are presumed to be the SURETY. By the way, the surety is the one who pays. For emphasis let me say it one more time: Anytime you see "your name" in all capital letters IT IS NOT YOUR NAME!! It is the name of a separate entity, a legal fiction, the Straw Man.
     There are many educated people who believe that this argument is a lot of baloney. All I can say is, they might need further education. They might need to actually study the LAW and the EVIDENCE and not rely on presumption in the daily operation of the "government" and our society in general.
     This whole scheme starts when a natural person is born. A "Birth Certificate" is generated and sent to the State to be registered. It is then registered with the Department of Commerce, United States of America. Now why would a birth certificate be registered with the Department of Commerce if not to initiate the presumption that there is a new entity operating in commerce?
     At the same time the "Birth Certificate" is generated, the newborn child is also enumerated; assigned a number for the corporate government's accounting, tracking and control system. It's called a Social Security Number. These two acts are the beginning of the creation of the legal fiction and provide evidence to validate the corporate government's presumption that we are acting as a surety for the legal fiction. Hereafter, I will refer to this legal fiction as the Straw Man, because that's how the fiction operates in representing us in commerce.
    There is further evidence that the corporate government uses to validate this presumption:
  1. Application for Driver's License,
  2. Application for Marriage Certificate,
  3. Mortgage papers and Deeds of Trust on property,
  4. Other licenses or permits that are applied for,
  5. Voters Registration
  6. Filing a 1040 form with the IRS
  7. Responding to documents addressed to the Straw Man (in all capital letters),
  8. Registering your new Automobile as a Motor Vehicle,
  9. Opening a bank account, etc. ad infinitum.

     Now back to the courts.  Remember they are commercial courts. Remember also that commercial entities and natural people (living souls) cannot mix because they are two totally different types of entities.  Try mixing oil and water.  You can pour them into the same container and stir vigorously and you still have pieces of oil and water.  They do not combine.  Commercial courts have jurisdiction and authority over Commercial Entities (legal fictions) and not natural people.  How do they bring us into these courts and take action against us?  By coming against the Straw Man.
     Have you ever seen a court document with a heading that looks like "Bill Green v. John Doe"?  No.  It will be BILL GREEN v. JOHN DOE.  When a person files a suit into a court, ANY court from J.P court all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, this is the way it is done.  And it AUTOMATICALLY creates the presumption that both parties are sureties for the named legal entities or Straw Men.  Now, if you answer this suit by using the court heading and filing your answer into the court, you validate the presumption that you are the surety for the Straw Man that has been sued.  This places you and the Straw Man under the authority and jurisdiction of the court and nothing you say or do after that point will invalidate their presumption of jurisdiction.
     You can, however, respond in such an instance, with a Notice. This is not legal advice, but merely an example for understanding:
 
 

Notice of Refusal and Return of Erroneously Served Papers
     John Daniel Doe hereby returns papers erroneously and fraudulently served relating to cause number CC-98-111111-A, the papers including a PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION, which were served on the 12th day of August in the year 1998, the action issuing against an unknown and unidentified legal fiction, JOHN D. DOE.
     My proper Christian and surname are John Daniel Doe; I was born live to Robert Doe and Mary Doe in the community of Dallas, county of Dallas, Texas; I am commonly known as and conduct most private affairs merely as John Doe.
     I do not know who or what the legal fiction JOHN D. DOE is, nor do I serve in the capacity of trustee, administrator, fiscal agent, surety, representative or in any other fiduciary capacity for the said JOHN D. DOE.
[End of Notice]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    The above notice contains statements of fact to rebut the presumption created by the Plaintiff who filed the suit that you are the surety for the Straw Man. This notice would be sent to the Plaintiff or his attorney, with a copy being sent to the court in which the case was filed.
     Now how does the corporate government use the principle of presumption in cases of commercial crime? By the way, have you ever heard the term "Commercial Crime" before? Did you know that almost all crimes have been defined by the corporate government as Commercial Crimes? That is, in fact, the case. The method of operation, especially in the case of the corporate federal government, is this: They many times start with the seizure of some kind of property. Cash, automobile, computers or something else. They do this with a warrant based on a belief that the property is being used in a criminal activity. This action is usually followed by an indictment and arrest. The "defendant" (Straw Man with you as surety) is then arraigned and a trial date is set.
     This whole procedure is based on a legal presumption that you are a criminal and were in possession of property being used in criminal activity. This presumption MUST BE DEFEATED if you are to avoid conviction. There is only one way to defeat the primary presumption. Remember, the presumption was created when the property was seized. You MUST file a claim in civil court for the return of the property that was lawfully owned by you and was lawfully in your possession. If you are successful in this action, you will permanently defeat their presumption of criminal activity and they cannot proceed.
     But you might say, "Wait a minute, I've always been told that you are presumed to be innocent until proven guilty." Yes, that IS what we are told. In fact, it used to be that way. But the presumption of innocence went out the window in 1933 when the Trading With The Enemy Act of 1917 was amended to INCLUDE the people of America as ENEMIES of the corporate U.S. Government. From that time until now, the presumption is that you are guilty until proven innocent. That is precisely the reason that the United States is now the WORLD LEADER IN NUMBER OF PEOPLE INCARCERATED! Over TWO MILLION people are now in jail in the United States and Texas.  The United States has more political prisoners than any other country in the world!!
     There are many people who are now struggling against the "jurisdiction" of the corporate courts. Many methods have been tried and are being tried. We must remember that the administrative judges of the commercial courts have a lot of experience at validating their presumptions. The first thing they want to do is validate their presumption that they have jurisdiction because you are the surety for the defendant, the Straw Man. Of course, they allow you to think that you ARE the defendant, but that is not possible because a legal fiction court can only have legal fictions as defendants.
     They know every trick in or out of the book to trap you into becoming the "defendant," thereby validating their presumption. I heard of one case where the man was successfully challenging jurisdiction until the judge said, "Will the Defendant please take the toothpick out of his mouth?" When the man removed the toothpick from his mouth he placed himself squarely into the jurisdiction of the court because his action validated the presumption that he was the defendant.
     THE PRESUMPTION THAT YOU ARE THE SURETY FOR THE STRAW MAN MUST BE DEFEATED if you are to have any semblance of the freedom God created you to enjoy and the forefathers of the United States and the forefathers of Texas intended for you to have.
     The nexus they have created for us to operate in is complex and complete. The third paragraph of page 3 lists just nine of the "contracts" or agreements that all of us unknowingly enter into that create and validate the Straw Man presumption. Now, in reality, by true Law, these contracts and agreements are null and void from the beginning due to lack of full disclosure. This lack of full disclosure equates to fraud, and fraud vitiates (eliminates) any contract ab initio (from the beginning).
     One way to begin to rebut and defeat the presumption is by the use of a NOTICE. One example of such a notice is attached to this narrative for your review. (Attachment "A")
     This notice presents declarations and facts to rebut the corporate government's presumption of your status. There are other ways to rebut and defeat the presumption.
     The method that many are using today is the process called Commercial Redemption. This process utilizes the Uniform Commercial Code and its provisions for filing a security interest with the Secretary of State.  When a living soul files a UCC-1 [financial statement] on the Straw Man for which he is presumed to be the surety, he moves from being the surety to the position of Creditor.
     When one Accepts his Birth Certificate for Value (Acceptance for Value Process), he completes the removal of himself as the surety for the Straw Man, and redeems the title to himself by becoming the "Holder in Due Course" of the title (Birth Certificate).
     This process causes Legal Freedom.  It uses the commercial code that the bankers promoted with the intention of controlling all commerce - and thus, all people - to change one's position from presumed "surety" to that of Creditor and Holder in Due Course.  Thus, when this process is correctly completed one regains the natural freedom given by his Creator and Legal Freedom within the artificial commercial society in which we live.
     In order to use the Commercial Redemption process, one must become educated in the process. There is much material available on this process all over Texas and all over the United States. Many seminars and workshop are being held to educate people about this process. I would urge people to thoroughly research and study this process before using it and be advised that there is conflicting information being disseminated. As with any information, it is up to the one learning to become educated and confident in the proper use of such information.
     There are many who try to debunk the Commercial Redemption process with all kinds of arguments which I consider to be erroneous. I, for one, am completely and totally convinced of the truth and veracity of the information presented in this narrative regarding the Straw Man and the presumptions of the corporate government based on the Straw Man.
     There are some who seek to use the Commercial Redemption process as a "Commercial Get-Revenge-and-Get-Rich" process.  I don't believe this is the proper application of the process.  I personally believe that if we can use this process to stop unlawful processes of corporate government against us, and truly REDEEM ourselves from the commercial world of international bankers and their control of our lives, we have accomplished the biggest part of the struggle for freedom.
     There is probably more we will learn as we continue in our struggle for the Freedom we are so glibly told that we already have, and we must continue to be open minded and learn all we can.
     I heartily encourage each and every one of you to learn all you can about the artificial commercial society we live in, how it impacts and affects us, how we can work to be free as we desire to be, and how to work towards defeating the presumptions that are enslaving us all.  It is my desire that all the people of Texas, and those of the States of the American Union, will learn the truth about the presumptions of the corporate government, learn that there is no lawful Constitutional government in existence today and learn to regain their freedom and liberty under God, our Creator.
     In parting, I wish to include some words from that great patriot, Thomas Jefferson: "...the Federal Judiciary; an irresponsible body , working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little to-day and a little to-morrow, and advancing it's noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the States, and the government of all be consolidated into one. ... when all government ... in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the center of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated."
Thomas Jefferson
The ultimate tragedy is that his words apply to the entire so-called ìfederal governmentî and all of its outside-the-constitution agencies and bureaucracies, not just the judiciary. Respectfully Submitted,
Jesse Enloe, President
Republic of Texas Provisional Government


 RELATED LINKS



 YOUTUBE 



 TWITTER

Texas Case 95-1002 and HAGUE Case 94135



On November 16, 1995, in cause no. 95-1002, the Corporate Supreme Court of the STATE OF TEXAS passed for want of jurisdiction concerning the sovereign Nation of
the republic of Texas. The ruling from this Court establishes the truth and the fact that the STATE OF TEXAS and its Corporate political Subdivisions (Hereinafter "THE STATE OF TEXAS") has Want of Jurisdiction and/or venue over the sovereign De Jure republic of Texas and its declared Texian National citizens, whether it be through the corporate government of THE STATE OF TEXAS and/or its corporate Administrative Agencies, such as the STATE BAR OF TEXAS with its 3rd party agents and/or THE STATE OF TEXAS Corporate Judicial System of Administrative Courts.

On December 18, 1995, Cause No. 94135, The International Court of Justice (ICJ), which has its seat in The Hague, and is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations ruled Want of Jurisdiction concerning the Nation of the republic of Texas. Let it be noted the ICJ cannot rule on sovereign issues. It can only on CORPORATE issues
between CORPORATE NATIONS or STATES with differences between two or more CORPORATIONS or CORPORATE STATES due to its own corporate status.




Notice of perpetrated Fraud:

Pending a Default of Notices above, the named entities, you, COMMISSIONER JERRY PATTERSON representing the TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE in collusion with THE STATE OF TEXAS and/or State of Texas, will have acquiesced to the Declaration of Fraud as fact. Let it now be noted that Fraud through trickery, color of law and collusion is being perpetrated, and has been perpetrated, upon the Texian people of this republic, being Texas. Be advised that all lands within the geographical and political boundaries of this Nation, being the republic of Texas, belong to the true Overseer our Creator of the lands and the Texian people are its caretakers not you and/or the Corporation(s) figureheads.

1. It is hereby noted, the Corporation(s), THE STATE OF TEXAS and/or the State of
Texas, is fraudulently acting as the peoples Representative Government of Texas. This authority has been challenged as fraud since March 1996 when served to then Governor, George W. Bush in Austin, republic, being Texas. All demands to show authority have never been rebutted.

2. Whereas; the fraud is presently being used for the attempted and actual theft of peoples lands from several families of Texians within the geographical and political boundaries of the Nation of the republic, being Texas. This theft is being perpetrated by claiming lands through collusion by trickery using color of law and fraud using the preface of Public Domain, bad surveys, Ad valorem and other unlawful corporate taxes, use of Merchant
Law, non-organic constitutional Commercial Courts and bypassing all the peoples' natural rights derived from their Creator God, and the peoples Declaration of Rights. All
construed without the authority or permission from the Texian people. Therefore, without permission, Venue and/or Jurisdiction, under man's International Common Law, THE STATE OF TEXAS and/or State of Texas, is creating criminal trespass and/or theft by Fraud and/or Commercial Trickery.

The Texian people being lawful private landowners by and through their Creator of the
Lands given by HIS authority, press for the following:

The Texian People, declare that any agreements (commercial or otherwise) created by man between the foreign entities the UNITED STATES and THE STATE OF TEXAS, THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, THE STATE OF COLORADO, THE STATE OF WYOMING, THE STATE OF KANSAS, THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, UNITED NATIONS, NATO, THE WORLD COURT, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, or any other derivatives used by any of the above, does not apply to the Texian People of the republic of Texas, and will not be recognized by the Texian People without a properly recorded and sealed Treaty of Commerce or Treaty of Peace between our Nation, the republic of Texas and any other lawful Nation(s).

The Texian People, declare that the corporate foreign entities inside the geographical and political boundaries of the republic of Texas have no ceded Jurisdiction or Venue or Charter to operate commercially. We do not give permission to fraudulently convert our family names, our land titles, use trickery for compliance, harass, threaten, or intimidate WE the Texian people of Texas by any means over the rightful ownership of private property.

The Texian People, demand all documentation from THE STATE OF TEXAS and/or the State of Texas showing its authority for converting family names and family land titles or any other contractual authority to lay claim/reclaim to any Texian National citizen's private Homestead and/or property be brought forward for lawful verification under our authority.
The Sovereign Texian People, being living souls, derived their life from the sovereign
Creator of the universe and plead that our inherited rights to claim the land of Texas was derived from the Creator of all destinies by covenant not by man created Corporations, Fictions, Trust, Charters and all boundaries were permanently installed within several sealed international treaties for the people forever. Having presented our case to you and Absent a positive truthful reply in this, the matter will be turned over to our Father in
Heaven who is the final authority for he has stated, Vengeance is mine.
The Land of Texas will forever belong to the people.

The Peoples' rights are inalienable, unalienable, imprescriptible and must be honored.

Final Demand #1 (contract pending time frame)
To all parties, persons and entities listed in collusion with this Commercial fraud and thievery of real private property: You are demanded to cease and desist immediately, or face possible Criminal Complaints/charges, to include restitution for past, present and future actions against the people of Texas, a republic. Your non-rebuttal and/or silence will constitute support of the FRAUD. We the People are issuing these Demands, without dishonor and by the will of the Texian people; because we have discovered that the Texian people have no liabilities to foreign un-chartered and/or unauthorized Commercial Entities operating within the geographical and political boundaries of the republic of Texas.

Final Demand #2 (contract pending time frame)
It is now demanded through me, Ed Brannum, Interim Secretary of Interior for the Texian people, for you to produce your Statutory and Regulatory authority that gives you venue and jurisdiction. It should be easily found in your Government Codes and organic Constitution to include a ratified Treaty of Annexation between the republic of Texas and the united States of America. The ratified Treaty should also be found in the Congressional Records of the united States of America and the republic of Texas. If you COMMISSIONER JERRY PATTERSON and all you are fail to comply, a fault will exist. In addition, your failure to promptly comply with this information will make void and invalidate all presentments, title transfers with name conversions. All invalidations IN FRAUDEM LEGIS will include all unlawful recordings involving any declared Texian National being past, present and/or future. You have ten days maximum from the date of receipt of this certified letter, to comply with or rebut my Demands for information.

Final Demand #3 (contract pending time frame)
COMMISSIONER JERRY PATTERSON, and all you are, that the unauthorized
Commercial foreign entities THE ACTING CORPORATE STATES AND/OR DERIVATIVES, POSSESSIONS, TERRITORIES OR ENCLAVES (REF. page four above) inside the geographical and political boundaries of the republic of Texas, including all Sub-Corporate Counties/Cities or any other fictional derivative(s) used in the unlawful title conversion of property, fraudulently confiscating of private property, the using of threats, coercion, collusion, conversion, and trickery using color of law for thievery of the Texian People's Lands is IN FRAUDEM LEGIS and is forever dissolved from doing Commercial business inside the geographical and political boundaries of the republic of Texas.

Final Demand #4 (contract pending time frame)
Furthermore all assets fraudulently confiscated by THE ACTING CORPORATE STATES AND/OR DERIVATIVES, POSSESSIONS, TERRITORIES OR ENCLAVES (REF. page
four above) inside the geographical and political boundaries of the republic of Texas, including all Sub-Corporate Counties/Municipalities/Cities or any other fictional derivative(s) and/or its Agents are to remain on the Land being the republic of the Texas and returned to the Texian people. Including all assets filtered and maneuvered throughout any Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports and/or any Annual Cash Financial Reports
and/or any other financial report derivative name used, that concerns all Texian Peoples lands within the borders of the republic of Texas. You have 10 days in which to respond or rebut.

ORDER NISI (contract pending time frame)

All Texian People s Public land titles, Veteran land titles and/or any other land titles in holding as land titles are to be transferred over to the republic of Texas to be secured and held by the present Commissioner Jerry Patterson for the Texian people until such time that restitution and distribution can be achieved through the Interim Government and National Assembly of the republic of Texas.

All CAFR accounts/assets and Annual Financial Reports Volume I and II assets including all Trust accounts and/or other derivative accounting names associated with the Texian Peoples Public and/or Private lands with properties, Veterans lands and/or any other lands in holdings will be frozen until all assets and credits have been converted or formulated into specie accounting. At the appropriate time, restitution and distribution shall be achieved through the Interim Government and National Assembly of the republic of Texas.

All real properties, assets, buildings, equipment and holdings and their titles, associated with all Corporate alleged Federal prisons doing unlawful Commercial business without charter(s) and/or Treaty inside the geographical and political boundaries of the republic of Texas are to immediately be transferred to the republic of Texas, Public General Land Office, and temporarily be held and secured by the present Commissioner Jerry Patterson for the Texian people until such time that restitution and distribution can be achieved through the Interim Government and National Assembly of the republic of Texas..

Non-compliance with the above Order NISI contract and/or Demand contract and with the continuing of criminal activities IN FRAUDEM LEGIS brought against the Texian People and their God given covenant rights brings forth;

A defaulted contract after 10 days to all concerned individual foreign parties, persons, assigns and/or Agents and/or Corporate entities in collusion with the present foreign Commercial frauds and thievery; are demanded to Cease and Desist immediately, or possibly be summoned for testimony in your behalf pending possible Criminal Complaints/charges recorded into the Republic of Texas Supreme Court. All Criminal Complaints/charges will include restitution for past, present and/or future actions against the people of Texas from Agent(s), administrator(s), or 3rd party representative(s) for THE ACTING CORPORATE STATES AND/OR DERIVATIVES, POSSESSIONS, TERRITORIES OR ENCLAVES (REF. page four above) inside the geographical and political boundaries of the republic of Texas and to include all Sub-Corporate Counties, Sub-Corporate Municipalities/Cities and/or any other fictional derivative(s).

Therefore; the contractual Demands and Orders above, being final, make any continued violations against the Texian people, a Trespass upon the Lands of Texas, and a defaulted contract after 10 days will constitute probable cause for international criminal trespass subjecting you and all you are, as an individual associated party, person(s), representative(s), 3rd parties, assigns and/or Agents and/or Corporate entities to possibly be summoned individually to appear before the Republic of Texas Supreme Court, an Admiralty/Equity Court. Non-appearance may lead to involuntary dissolvent and/or involuntary bankruptcy for any of the above that are summoned and found by the Court to be violating the Texian people. Assets received from these individual bankruptcies will be sold and/or bartered and returned to the Texian people.

May our Creator God Bless and Protect the Land of Texas Forever.

______________________
Ed Brannum
Secretary of Interior
Interim Government
The republic of Texas
P. O. Box 100 Suite 133
Overton, republic of Texas near RTPZ 75684
903-834-3592
http://www.republic-of-texas.net/

Seal
____________________________
Attested to by Rice McLeod Secretary of Judicial Affairs

 


 

 RELATED LINKS



 YOUTUBE 



 TWITTER

AFFIDAVIT Texas





AFFIDAVIT
Texas                    §
                                §     SS
Dallas County      §
I, Lewis Ray Daniel, the undersigned affiant and Consul General of the Provisional Government of the Republic of Texas, do hereby make this affidavit willingly and with full knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and attest to the veracity of said facts and state that I am competent to testify to same.
On or about June 12, 1998 NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION was mailed by Certified Mail #P 388 292 799 to Frank Newton (hereinafter "Newton"), Chief Administrator and President of the State Bar of Texas, an Administrative Agency (hereinafter "Agency") of the STATE OF TEXAS and to the Supreme Court of the STATE OF TEXAS. Said Notice was received by Newton and by the Supreme Court on June 15, 1998. Said Notice and proof of service are attached and incorporated by reference herein.
There has been no response to NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION.
On or about June 26, 1998 NOTICE OF DEFAULT NIHIL DICIT was mailed by Certified Mail #P 388 293 158 to Frank Newton (hereinafter "Newton"), Chief Administrator and President of the State Bar of Texas, an Administrative Agency (hereinafter "Agency") of the STATE OF TEXAS and to the Supreme Court of the STATE OF TEXAS. Said Notice was received by Newton on July 6, 1998 and by the Supreme Court on or about July 1, 1998. Said Notice and proof of service are attached and incorporated by reference herein.
There has been no response to NOTICE OF DEFAULT NIHIL DICIT.
The STATE OF TEXAS, through its agents, has affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that the State of Texas
Bar Association was created as an Administrative Agency of the Judicial Branch by the State Bar Act.
The STATE OF TEXAS, through its agents, has affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that the President and Chief Administrator of the State Bar of Texas is responsible for all acts of the Agents/Members of the State Bar of Texas which includes, but is not limited to, the acts of all agents of the judicial system of the STATE OF TEXAS.
The STATE OF TEXAS, through its agents, has affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that on November 16, 1995, in cause no. 95-1002, the Supreme Court of the STATE OF TEXAS passed for want of jurisdiction.
The STATE OF TEXAS, through its agents, has affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that this act of the Supreme Court establishes the truth and the fact that the STATE OF TEXAS, its political Subdivisions, and its ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES has no jurisdiction or venue regarding the Republic of Texas and its declared Citizens, whether it be through the government of the STATE OF TEXAS or its Administrative Agencies, such as the State Bar of Texas and its agents or the STATE OF TEXAS Judicial System of Administrative Courts (which includes the STATE OF TEXAS and all political subdivisions of the STATE OF TEXAS).
The STATE OF TEXAS, through its agents, has affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that the STATE OF TEXAS has no jurisdiction, venue, and authority to impose compelled performance or intrude upon the Substantive Rights or Private Property of the Provisional Government or the declared Citizens of the Republic of Texas through the private copyrighted laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations of the STATE OF TEXAS or to prosecute same in the Administrative Courts of the STATE OF TEXAS (which includes the STATE OF TEXAS and all political subdivisions of the STATE OF TEXAS).
Further, Affiant Sayeth Naught

Lewis Ray Daniel, Consul General
Republic of Texas Provisional Government
Date: July 11, 1998

Jesse Doyle Enloe - Witness
/s/ Bob McCrary - Witness

 RELATED LINKS



 YOUTUBE 



 TWITTER

NOTICE OF DEFAULT NIHIL DICIT Texas Bar




Office of the Consul General

NOTICE OF DEFAULT NIHIL DICIT
[See also: "AFFIDAVIT"]

To:   Mr. Frank Newton, Esquire
      Chief Administrator and President, State Bar of Texas
      400 W. 15th Street
      Austin, Texas 78711 Notice Date: June 26, 1998                              Certified Mail # P 388 293 158
Lewis Ray Daniel, Consul General of the Provisional
Government of the Republic of Texas, does hereby notice Frank Newton, Esquire and all heirs and assigns, all Agents of the State Bar of Texas, and all administrators of the Judicial System of Texas (hereinafter "Agents") of Default nihil dicit on previous Notice of Lack of Jurisdiction as no response has been given.
Agents have affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that the State of Texas Bar Association was created as an Administrative Agency of the Judicial Branch by the State Bar Act.
Agents have affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that the President and Chief Administrator of the State Bar of Texas is responsible for all acts of the Agents/Members of the State Bar of Texas which includes, but is not limited to, the acts of all agents of the judicial system of the STATE OF TEXAS.
Agents have affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that on November 16, 1995, in cause no. 95-1002, the Supreme Court of the STATE OF TEXAS passed for want of jurisdiction.
Agents have affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that this act of the Supreme Court establishes the truth and the fact that the STATE OF TEXAS and its political Subdivisions (hereinafter "STATE OF TEXAS") has no jurisdiction or venue regarding the Republic of Texas and its declared Citizens, whether it be through the government of the STATE OF TEXAS or its Administrative Agencies, such as the State Bar of Texas and its agents or the STATE OF TEXAS Judicial System of Administrative Courts (which includes the STATE OF TEXAS and all political subdivisions of the STATE OF TEXAS).
Agents have affirmed without dispute and confessed by default and acquiescence that the STATE OF TEXAS has no jurisdiction, venue, authority to impose compelled performance or intrude upon the Substantive Rights or Private Property of the Provisional Government or the declared Citizens of the Republic of Texas through the private copyrighted laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations of the STATE OF TEXAS or to prosecute same in the Administrative Courts of the STATE OF TEXAS (which includes the STATE OF TEXAS and all political subdivisions of the STATE OF TEXAS).
Notice to the principal is notice to the agent, notice to the agent is notice to the principal.
Any response to this NOTICE is required within 5 calendar days of receipt of this NOTICE.

Lewis Ray Daniel, Consul General
Republic of Texas Provisional Government
cc: STATE OF TEXAS Supreme Court Justices
Certified Mail # P 388 293 19

 RELATED LINKS



 YOUTUBE 



 TWITTER

NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION Texas Bar








Office of the Consul General

NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION
[See also: "NOTICE OF DEFAULT NIHIL DICIT" and
"AFFIDAVIT"]

To:    Mr. Frank Newton, Esquire
      Chief Administrator and President, State Bar of Texas
      400 W. 15th Street
      Austin, Texas 78711
Notice Date: June 12, 1998                              Certified Mail # P 388 292 799
Lewis Ray Daniel, Consul General of the Provisional
Government of the Republic of Texas, does hereby notice Frank Newton, Esquire and all heirs and assigns (hereinafter "Newton"), all Agents of the State Bar of Texas, and all administrators of the Judicial System of Texas of Lack of Jurisdiction.
Newton is the President and Chief Administrator of the State of Texas Bar Association, created as an Administrative Agency of the Judicial Branch by the State Bar Act. As Chief Administrator, Newton is responsible for all acts of the Agents/Members of the State Bar of Texas which includes, but is not limited to, the acts of all agents of the judicial system of the STATE OF TEXAS.
On November 16, 1995, in cause no. 95-1002, the Supreme Court of the STATE OF TEXAS passed for want of jurisdiction. This act of the Supreme Court establishes the truth and the fact that the STATE OF TEXAS and its political Subdivisions (hereinafter "STATE OF TEXAS") has no jurisdiction over the Republic of Texas and its declared Citizens, whether it be through the government of the STATE OF TEXAS or its Administrative Agencies, such as the State Bar of Texas and its agents or the STATE OF TEXAS Judicial System of Administrative Courts.
The STATE OF TEXAS has no jurisdiction, venue, authority to impose compelled performance or intrude upon the Substantive Rights or Private Property of the Provisional Government or the declared Citizens of the Republic of Texas through the private copyrighted laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations of the STATE OF TEXAS or to prosecute same in the Administrative Courts of the STATE OF TEXAS.
Notice to the principal is notice to the agent, notice to the agent is notice to the principal.
Any response to this NOTICE is required within 10 calendar days of receipt of this NOTICE. If additional time is needed, it may be requested. Any additional time must be requested within 10 calendar days of receipt of this NOTICE.

Lewis Ray Daniel, Consul General
Republic of Texas Provisional Government
cc: STATE OF TEXAS Supreme Court Justices
Certified Mail # P 388 292 799

 RELATED LINKS



 YOUTUBE 



 TWITTER