Sign the Petition to Peacefully Grant the State of Texas
to withdraw from the United States of America
and Create its own NEW Government
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
The November 6, 2012 Election is Complete!
The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution for the united states of America.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The Constitution of the Republic of Texas (1836)
This Declaration of Rights is declared to be a part of this Constitution, and shall never be violated on any pretence whatever. And in order to guard against the transgression of the high powers which we have delegated, we declare that every thing in this bill of rights contained, and every other right not hereby delegated, is reserved to the People.
All political power is inherent in the People, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit; and they have at all times an inalienable right to alter their government in such manner as they may think proper.
TEXAS CONSTITUTIONARTICLE 1. BILL OF RIGHTS
That the general, great and essential principles
of liberty and free government may be recognized
and established, we declare:
of liberty and free government may be recognized
and established, we declare:
Sec. 2. INHERENT POLITICAL POWER; REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.
The Texas Declaration of Independence
(March 2, 1836)
The Proposed New Texas Declaration of Independence (November 7, 2012)
When a government has ceased to protect the lives, liberty and
property of the people, from whom its legitimate powers are derived, and
for the advancement of whose happiness it was instituted, and so far
from being a guarantee for the enjoyment of those inestimable and
inalienable rights, becomes an instrument in the hands of evil rulers
for their oppression.
When the Federal Republican Constitution of their country, which they
have sworn to support, no longer has a substantial existence, and the
whole nature of their government has been forcibly changed, without
their consent, from a restricted federative republic, composed of
sovereign states, to a consolidated central military despotism, in which
every interest is disregarded but that of the army and International Bankers,
both the eternal enemies of civil liberty, the everready minions of
power, and the usual instruments of tyrants.
When, long after the spirit of the constitution has departed, moderation
is at length so far lost by those in power, that even the semblance of
freedom is removed, and the forms themselves of the constitution
discontinued, and so far from their petitions and remonstrances being
regarded, the agents who bear them are thrown into dungeons, and
mercenary armies sent forth to force a new socialist government upon them at the
point of the bayonet.
When, in consequence of such acts of malfeasance and abdication on the part of the government (Corporation), anarchy prevails, and civil society is dissolved into its original elements. In such a crisis, the first law of nature, the right of self-preservation, the inherent and inalienable rights of the people to appeal to first principles, and take their political affairs into their own hands in extreme cases, enjoins it as a right towards themselves, and a sacred obligation to their posterity, to abolish such government, and create another in its stead, calculated to rescue them from impending dangers, and to secure their future welfare and happiness.
Nations, as well as individuals, are amenable for their acts to the
public opinion of mankind. A statement of a part of our grievances is
therefore submitted to an impartial world, in justification of the
hazardous but unavoidable step now taken, of severing our political
connection with the Corporation A.K.A. UNITED STATES, and assuming an independent attitude
among the nations of the earth.
In this expectation they have been cruelly disappointed, inasmuch as the American nation has acquiesced in the late changes made in the
government (Corporation), who having overturned
the constitution of the country, now offers us the cruel alternative,
either to abandon our homes, acquired by so many privations, or submit
to the most intolerable of all tyranny, the combined despotism of the
sword.
It has sacrificed our welfare to the state (Corporation), by which our
interests have been continually depressed through a jealous and partial
course of legislation, carried on at a far distant seat of government,
by a hostile majority, and this too,
notwithstanding we have petitioned in the humblest terms for the
establishment of a separate state government, and have, in accordance
with the provisions of the national constitution, presented to the
general Congress a republican constitution, which was, without just
cause, contemptuously rejected.
It threatens to incarcerate in a dungeon, for a long time, without trial our citizens,
for no other cause but a zealous endeavor to procure
the acceptance of our constitution, and the establishment of a state
government.
It has failed and refused to secure, on a firm basis, the right of trial
by jury, that palladium of civil liberty, and only safe guarantee for
the life, liberty, and property of the citizen.
It has failed to establish any public system of education, although possessed of almost boundless resources, (the public domain,) and although it is an axiom in political science, that unless a people are educated and enlightened, it is idle to expect the continuance of civil liberty, or the capacity for self government.
It has suffered the military commandants and agents, stationed among us, to exercise arbitrary acts of oppression and tyrrany, thus trampling upon the most sacred rights of the citizens, and rendering the military superior to the civil power.
It has dissolved, the Constitution of the UNITED STATES, and is obliging our representatives to fly for their lives from the
seat of government, thus depriving us of the fundamental political right
of representation.
It has demanded the surrender of a number of our citizens, and ordered
military detachments to seize and carry them into the Interior without
trial, in contempt of the civil authorities, and in defiance of the laws
and the constitution.
It has made piratical attacks upon our commerce, by commissioning foreign desperadoes, and authorizing them to seize our vessels, and convey the property of our citizens to far distant ports for confiscation.
It denies us the right of worshipping the Almighty according to the dictates of our own conscience, by the support of a national religion, calculated to promote the temporal interest of its human functionaries, rather than the glory of the true and living God.
It has demanded us to deliver up our arms, which are essential to our defence, the rightful property of freemen, and formidable only to tyrannical governments.
It has invaded our country both by sea and by land, with intent to lay waste our territory, and drive us from our homes; and has now a large mercenary army advancing, to carry on against us a war of extermination.
It has, through its emissaries, incited the merciless savage, of the Tank, Helicopter, Jet and Drone, and other Black Op's programs to massacre the inhabitants of our
defenseless frontiers.
It hath been, during the whole time of our connection with it since 1845, the
contemptible sport and victim of successive military revolutions, and
hath continually exhibited every characteristic of a weak, corrupt, and
tyrranical government.
These, and other grievances, were patiently borne by the people of
Texas, untill they reached that point at which forbearance ceases to be a
virtue.
We appealed to our American brethren for assistance. Our appeal has
been made in vain. Though months have elapsed, no sympathetic response
has yet been heard from the Interior. We are, therefore, forced to the
melancholy conclusion, that the American people have acquiesced in the
destruction of their liberty, and the substitution therfor of a military
government and Police State; that they are unfit to be free, and incapable of self
government.
The necessity of self-preservation, therefore, now decrees our eternal political separation.
We, therefore, the delegates with plenary powers of the people of Texas,
in solemn convention assembled, appealing to a candid world for the
necessities of our condition, do hereby resolve and declare, that our
political connection with the American nation has forever ended, and that
the people of Texas do now constitute a free, Sovereign, and
independent republic, and are fully invested with all the rights and
attributes which properly belong to independent nations; and, conscious
of the rectitude of our intentions, we fearlessly and confidently commit
the issue to the decision of the Supreme arbiter of the destinies of
nations.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Now that the Nov 6, 2012 Election is complete, The American people have acquiesced in the
destruction of their liberty, and the substitution therfor of a military
government and Police State; that they are unfit to be free, and incapable of self
government.
A Man I know E-Mailed me and said,
"This presidential election serves as a clear signal from the rest of the Union to Texas - we do not care for your right of local self-government and we do not share your values.
Tonight, the Union seceded from Texas.
"This presidential election serves as a clear signal from the rest of the Union to Texas - we do not care for your right of local self-government and we do not share your values.
Tonight, the Union seceded from Texas.
While
the alternative candidate could not have alone saved the United States
from the looming economic disaster nor could he single-handedly have
repaired the damage to our liberties and the Constitution which is the
sole thread holding this union together, his opponent represented a
descent into the final destruction of the republican form of government
envisioned by the Founders of the United States and Texas.
With this, Texas cannot abide.
It is our duty to stand tall and become the example of what a free and independent people can be.
I
urge all Texans to stand with us as together as we follow the examples
of the heroes of 1836 and declare that Texas is and forever will be free
and independent."
God Bless Texas!!!!!!!
RELATED LINKS
YOUTUBE
Monday, November 5, 2012
Read this before you VOTE!
Note#: See commentary below after you read the document!
Two Constitutions and Fraud. The united states of America Vs. the UNITED STATES.
In 1995 The Republican Party of Texas recognized, that the acts of the Congressional Body and the Office of the President of the united States of America created a Purported (Fraudulent) Emergency condition, and that on and after March 6, 1933 the same said Public Offices effectively impaired and suspended the Constitution of the United States only, "Not" the Constitution for the united states of America.
Whereas: The Constitution of the United States is no more than a Corporate Charter.
Therefore: The Constitution for the united states of America with its original 13 Amendments still stands Ordained and Established by the People.
Whereas: The same said Public Offices mentioned above Effectively suspended and Impaired the Constitution of the United States, (A Corporate Charter) Pursuant to February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62, And Pursuant to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation, (15) "United States" means —
(A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
U.S. Supreme Court
STOUTENBURGH v. HENNICK, 129 U.S. 141 (1889)
129 U.S. 141
STOUTENBURGH, Intendant of Washington Asylum,
v.
HENNICK.
January 14, 1889
Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871, entitled 'An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia,' (16 St. 419,) are as follows: 'Section 1. That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.' 'Sec. 18. That the legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144] extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District, consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act, subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative assembly shall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the congress of the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to deprive congress of the power of legislation over said District in as ample manner as if this law had not been enacted.' These sections are carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled 'An act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, relating to the District of Columbia, in force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,' as sections 2, 49, 50.
Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such DISTRICT NOT EXCEEDING TEN MILES SQUARE, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States.
And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First Congress passed an act entitled "An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia," legislating the organization of a municipal corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbia, the seat of government, which transferred the United States of America, the Republic, into "a corporate entity" entitled UNITED STATES, in capital letters, having "no" jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia.
And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporation. This municipal corporation was granted the power to contract to provide municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of Article Four of the Constitution, any other person who chooses to contract for its services.
"The Constitution for the united states of America".
The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same
document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in
an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking
it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is
not.
So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered
Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic
Constitution
The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers.
Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This
could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men
(assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money
and power.
By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the
People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the
Declaration of Independence and the original Constitution.
The
US corporation (originally called the District of Columbia) does not
effect or control the 50 sovereign states that are protected from the
federal government by the US Constitution for the United States adopted in 1788.The same said Public Offices mentioned above Effectively Suspended and Impaired the Constitution of the United States (A Corporate Charter) Under Pretense of Fraud of these same Emergency Conditions.
The Impairments and Disabilities yet exist and are in full force and effect throughout the Nation and Several States of the Union. There has occured continuous breech of trust, duty and obligation imposed under Alleged Authority of the Constitution of the United States (A Corporate Charter), resulting continued abridgement of Rights, Privlages, Immunities, and Liberties of Citizens and others, all commited under Pretense of Fraud of a continuing National crises and Furtherance of Emergency Conditions.
In the "Forward" of the United States Senate Report 93-549, 1973 it States "Since March 9, 1933, the United States of America has been in a declared state of National Emergency (Bankruptcy), which has not been resolved.
Senate Report 93-549, 1973, admits and professes that "This vast range of powers taken together confers enough authority to rule our country without reference to normal Constitutional Process."
Whereas: Notice Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260 on or about March 4, to March 9, 1933.
In Title 12 U.S.C. sec 95b, it is arbitrarily declared that "The Actions, Regulations, Rules, Licenses, Orders and Proclamations heretofore and hereafter taken, promulgated, made or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury Since March 4, 1933, Pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12 U.S.C. sec 95a), are hereby approved and confirmed, (March 9, 1933, Ch 1. Title 1. Sec 1. 48 Stat. 1.)
Therefore: It is recognized that every Order Issued by the President since March 9,1933, or any Order Issued thereafter is and was automatically approved and confirmed.
These Powers being conferred under Purported (Fraud) Authority of the Act of October 6, 1917 as Amended, are wrongfully used against the Several States of the Union and the People (See Stoehr vs. Wallace 255 US 239)
Notice the Banking Emergency Act, 48 Stat. 1. March 9, 1933, Pay Close Attention to Clause 5(b), which changed the wording of "Enemy" in the War Powers Act of October 6, 1917, as amended to "Citizens within this Country, by any Person within the United States, or any place subject to the Jurisdiction thereof."
Therefore Declaring "War" on the Sovereign American People, by the Fraudulent Corporate U.S., or U.S.A. INC.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So you mean they're sayin'?
What is being dealt with is a Rogue Corporation with many Policies and Procedures of that Corporation, under the Corporate Charter that looks like the Beloved Constitution, But it is "Not"!Each and every (Alleged Law) Policy and Procedure passed since Feb 13, 1871 is Not Law, but is actually FRAUD Perpetrated on the People during the Grant Administration.
That means each and every (Alleged Law) Policy and Procedure is UNCONSTITUTIONAL since Feb 13,1871:
Therefore: Marbury Vs. Madison 1803 comes into play, which states "That every Law passed that is UNCONSTITUTIONAL is Null and Void, Void ab-initio from the start."
The Constitution for the united states of America 1778 with its original 13 Amendments still stands as Positive Law!
Now the Constitution of the UNITED STATES 1871 is nothing more than a Corporate Charter, and due to F.D.R. in March 1933 that Corporate Charter, The Constitution of the UNITED STATES was suspended and never has been Re-instituted since.
Those Executive Orders and Presidential Directives are Corporate Policies that are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, Due to the fact they are Policies and Procedures of the Corporate Executive Officer of the Corporation A.K.A. UNITED STATES.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Now Article III. Section III to the Constitution for the united states of America, states:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.
Every (Alleged Law) Policy and Procedure and Alleged Treaty since Feb 13, 1871 including the Executive Orders and Presidential Directives are an ACT of High Treason against the Constitution for the united states of America.
Therefore: My question is: Do you want a National President under the Constitution for the united states of America, or do you want to continue with a Corporate Executive Officer of a Rogue Corporation that has a suspended Charter since March 9, 1933?
RELATED LINKS
Friday, October 26, 2012
Cotton Harvesting 101
Monday, September 3, 2012
Sunday, September 2, 2012
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Sunday, August 26, 2012
Counsel General Interim Gov't Republic of Texas Responds to Judge Tom Head
Counsel General Interim Gov't Republic of Texas
Responds to Judge Tom Head
KCBD News Channel 11 Reports on Judge Tom Head with Counsel General at Podium 1:10 2/3
Counsel General was quoted by the New York Times and Austin American-Statesman:
Responds to Judge Tom Head
KCBD News Channel 11 Reports on Judge Tom Head with Counsel General at Podium 1:10 2/3
Counsel General was quoted by the New York Times and Austin American-Statesman:
“I believe that we need a sheriff’s militia to protect Lubbock County,
and get all the sheriffs in Texas to start a militia to protect Texas,”
Kim Wade Gatewood, 48, told the commissioners and Mr. Head.
After the hearing, Mr. Gatewood, an agricultural contractor, identified
himself as the counsel general of the interim government of the Republic
of Texas, which he said was not active at the moment. “If secession
happens,” he said, “it’ll be active in a split second.”
Text of the Video:
At this point I do not know if there is anything I can do
Officially as Counsel General of the Interim Government of the Republic
of Texas, but as a fellow Texian-Texican National living on the soil of
Texas, I
do have to come out and Back Lubbock County Judge Tom Head and Yes,
Civil unrest, Civil disobedience and maybe Civil War looms ahead for
America, but Texas is a different story which may soon be on the blog http://NewTexasNation.blogspot.com/
Now on Judge Tom Heads' comment on Standing at the border and just having the Sheriffs Office Back him, the Invading Forces would run right over Judge Tom Head and the Sheriff's office.
We really need to raise the Tax 2 cents and every cent
goes to beef up the Lubbock County Sheriffs Office, and form a
Sheriff's Militia out of the Population in Lubbock County. I contend
that the Sheriff and his Deputies Keep all the arresting Power as Peace
Officers, but the Sheriff's Militia be trained for the contingency of
Combat to be called out under the Sheriff in the case of an invasion.
Every Person above the age of 18 who Does NOT have a Felony Record serve
in the Sheriff's Militia's for the Protection of Lubbock County and for
the Protection of Texas.
Just
think of the Great Standing Army Texas would have, if each Sheriff in
each County formed a Sheriff's Militia. Then the saying "Don't Mess With Texas" would be exact!
The Sheriff is
the highest elected Official in the County and not even the Office of
the President cannot usurp authority over him. That in itself would be a
direct violation of the 10th Amendment and Article III sec. III of the
Constitution for the united States of America.
Therefore; I Duly Hereby
Stand and Back and Endorse Lubbock County Judge Tom Head and I call for
the formation of the Sheriffs Militia.
As for county Democratic
Party's chief Kenny Ketner, Apparently you don't know what is going on,
or just don't care. Due to the fact I have sat for 20 years doing my
study and research. NO, Judge Tom Head does not need to resign, rather
proceed for preparations in the event something goes awry as Judge Head Stated.
Attorney
Rod Hobson, I do not take the fact you placed U.N. Flags around or near
your Office as a joke. That offended me personally as a Natural Born
Texian National. That is really Mocking and Serious to all Texians, and I
don't appreciate what you said about Tom Head, and I quote: "When I
saw the story I thought, once again, Lubbock is going to be the
laughingstock of the entire nation," you said. And you went on to say,
and I quote: "What makes it so sad is he is our elected county judge,
who is in charge of a multimillion-dollar budget. That is scary. It's
like the light's on, but no one is home. ... I'd just like to think he's
off his meds."
Sir, what meds? There is nothing wrong with Judge Tom Head.
Then the lone Democrat
Lubbock County Commissioner Gilbert Flores, described Head with a
colorful West Texas saying: "He's a six-pack short of a full case of
beer, if you know what I mean."
Sir, You have not done your
research either as I have many years and saying what you did about
Judge Tom head is just ridiculous.
The Constitution for the united states of America 1787 states in the 10th Amendment:
The powers not
delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it
to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the
people.
Next: In the Second Amendment:
A
well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
A Sheriff's Militia would definitely be a well- regulated Militia.
Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist
only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies,
giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason
unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on
Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of Treason,
but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or
Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained.
THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1. BILL OF RIGHTS
That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, we declare:
Sec. 1. FREEDOM
AND SOVEREIGNTY OF STATE. Texas is a free and independent State,
subject only to the Constitution of the United States, and the
maintenance of our free institutions and the perpetuity of the Union
depend upon the preservation of the right of local self-government,
unimpaired to all the States.
Sec. 2. INHERENT
POLITICAL POWER; REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. All political power is
inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their
authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of
Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of
government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times
the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in
such manner as they may think expedient.
Sec. 22. TREASON.
Treason against the State shall consist only in levying war against it,
or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort; and no person
shall be convicted of treason except on the testimony of two witnesses
to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
Sec. 23. RIGHT
TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. Every citizen shall have the right to keep and
bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the
Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms,
with a view to prevent crime.
Sec. 24. MILITARY SUBORDINATE TO CIVIL AUTHORITY. The military shall at all times be subordinate to the civil authority.
Sec. 25. QUARTERING
SOLDIERS IN HOUSES. No soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in
the house of any citizen without the consent of the owner, nor in time
of war but in a manner prescribed by law.
In the Constitution of the Republic of Texas 1836.
This
declaration of rights is declared to be a part of this constitution, and
shall never be violated on any pretense whatever. And in order to guard
against the transgression of the high powers which we have delegated,
we declare that everything in this bill of rights contained, and every
other right not hereby delegated, is reserved to the people.
1st. All
men, when they form a social compact, have equal rights; and no men or
set of men are entitled to exclusive public privileges or emoluments
from the community.
2nd. All
political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are
founded on their authority and instituted for their benefit; and they
have at all times an inalienable right to alter their government in such
manner as they may think proper.
14th. Every citizen shall have the right to bear arms in defense of himself and the republic.
The military shall at all times and in all cases be subordinate to the civil power.
15th. The sure and certain defense of a free people is a
well-regulated militia; and it shall be the duty of the legislature to
enact such laws as may be necessary to the organizing of the militia of
this republic.
16th. Treason
against this republic shall consist only in levying war against it, or
adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and support. No retrospective
or ex post facto law, or laws impairing the obligations of contracts, shall be made.
The
sheriff is unique in the law enforcement arena in that he is the last,
and only, law enforcement administrator that is elected to his office by
the people. The administrative heads of all other law enforcement
entities are appointed to their positions, either by mayors, city
councils, city managers, and politicians or other managerial boards. The
people have no voice in the selection of these law enforcement
administrators, and no recourse if they do not agree with their
policies. The sheriff is the only law enforcement official with the
authority to summon the power of the county.....
The
sheriff is the only law enforcement official with the authority to
summon the power of the county. The sheriff's has the right, granted by
Posse Comitatus, to assemble a militia or posse, and the power to
deputize citizens and require them to assist in the keeping of the peace
and the enforcement of laws. The sheriff represents the power of the
people; he does not represent the power of the state. His use of the
power of the state must not conflict with his obligation to protect the
individual rights of the people whom he represents. When it comes to
keeping the peace no one's authority exceeds that of the sheriff. The
sheriff is absolutely obligated to his duty to protect the rights of the
people, and that obligation is primary to any
obligation whatever to support other law enforcement agencies in whatever cause.
The
people in states where sheriff’s offices have not been
unconstitutionally eliminated should demand that their sheriffs’ live up
to their obligation to represent the interests of the people who elect
them, and if they refuse to do so, the people should remove them because
they are unfit to occupy the office.
The court confirms and asserts
that “the duly elected sheriff of a county is the highest law
enforcement official within a county and has law enforcement powers
EXCEEDING that of any other state OR federal official.” And you thought
the 10th Amendment was dead and buried.
(Case No. 2:96-cv-099-J (2006)) and announced that all federal
officials are forbidden to enter his county without his prior approval
……
“If a sheriff doesn’t want the Feds in his county he has
the constitutional right and power to keep them out, or ask them to
leave, or retain them in custody.”
The Sheriff has the Right, Power, Duty and Obligation to tell all occupying Agency from outside of Texas to vacate the County, Including the T.S.A.
The Sheriff's Duty and Obligation doubles with each Citizen who Demands that all occupying Agency from outside of Texas to vacate the County, Including the T.S.A.
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT HAS RULED.
The “supremacy clause” is dealt with in Mack/Printz, in which the U.S. Supreme Court stated once and for all, that the only thing “supreme” is the Constitution itself. Where by the powers, the Sheriff reigns supreme above the president.
On June 27th, 1997, the sheriffs won; in Printz v. U.S. (521 U.S. 898) the U.S. Supreme Court struck Brady down. Associate Justice Antonin Scalia wrote
the ruling for the Court, in which he explained our system of
government at length. The justly revered system of checks and balances
is the key:
THE COURTS HAVE SPOKEN! “Any legislation
including the Patriot Acts which attempts to compel State Officers to
execute Federal Law is unconstitutional. Further, any federal
investigational liberties can be forbidden by the States’ highest law
enforcement officer. Finally, any attempts by a federal agency to coerce
compliance to such liberties can be grounds for arrest of any of their
agents who do not comply with the directions of that officer.”
[A quote from the Supreme Court Case below:
"‘[T]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.’”]
"‘[T]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.’”]
And for the fact of: Pursuant to February
21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the
"Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters
61 and 62, And Pursuant to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the
capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28
3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation, (15) "United States" means —
(A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
U.S. Supreme Court
STOUTENBURGH v. HENNICK, 129 U.S. 141 (1889)
129 U.S. 141
STOUTENBURGH, Intendant of Washington Asylum,
v.
HENNICK.
January 14, 1889
Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871,
entitled 'An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia,'
(16 St. 419,) are as follows: 'Section 1. That all that part of the
territory of the United States included within the limits of the
District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a
government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is
hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may
contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be
impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal
corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the
United States and the provisions of this act.' 'Sec. 18. That the
legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144] extend to
all rightful subjects of legislation within said District, consistent
with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this
act,
subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed
upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the
constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative
assembly shall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the
congress of the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to
deprive congress of the power of legislation over said District in as
ample manner as if this law had not been enacted.' These sections are
carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled 'An
act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United States, general
and permanent in their nature, relating to the District of Columbia, in
force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,' as sections 2, 49, 50.
Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district not exceeding ten miles square, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States.
And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First
Congress passed an act entitled "An Act to Provide a Government for the
District of Columbia," legislating the organization of a municipal
corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbia,
the seat of government, which transferred the United States of America,
the Republic, into "a corporate entity" entitled UNITED STATES, in
capital letters, having "no" jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia.
And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution
as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporation. This
municipal corporation was granted the power to contract to provide
municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and
necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of
Article Four of the Constitution, any other person who chooses to
contract for its services.
The US corporation (originally called the District of Columbia ) does not effect or control the 50 sovereign states that are protected from the federal government by the US Constitution for the United States adopted in 1788.
Friday, August 24, 2012
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Two Constitutions and Fraud. The united states of America vs. the UNITED STATES!
In 1995 The Republican Party of Texas recognized, that the acts of the Congressional Body and the Office of the President of the united States of America created a Purported (Fraudulent) Emergency condition, and that on and after March 6, 1933 the same said Public Offices effectively impaired and suspended the Constitution of the United States only, "Not" the Constitution for the united states of America.
Whereas: The Constitution of the United States is no more than a Corporate Charter.
Therefore: The Constitution for the united states of America with its original 13 Amendments still stands Ordained and Established by the People.
Whereas: The same said Public Offices mentioned above Effectively suspended and Impaired the Constitution of the United States, (A Corporate Charter) Pursuant to February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62, And Pursuant to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation, (15) "United States" means —
(A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
U.S. Supreme Court
STOUTENBURGH v. HENNICK, 129 U.S. 141 (1889)
129 U.S. 141
STOUTENBURGH, Intendant of Washington Asylum,
v.
HENNICK.
January 14, 1889
Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871, entitled 'An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia,' (16 St. 419,) are as follows: 'Section 1. That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.' 'Sec. 18. That the legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144] extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District, consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act, subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative assembly shall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the congress of the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to deprive congress of the power of legislation over said District in as ample manner as if this law had not been enacted.' These sections are carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled 'An act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, relating to the District of Columbia, in force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,' as sections 2, 49, 50.
Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such DISTRICT NOT EXCEEDING TEN MILES SQUARE, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States.
And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First Congress passed an act entitled "An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia," legislating the organization of a municipal corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbia, the seat of government, which transferred the United States of America, the Republic, into "a corporate entity" entitled UNITED STATES, in capital letters, having "no" jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia.
And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporation. This municipal corporation was granted the power to contract to provide municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of Article Four of the Constitution, any other person who chooses to contract for its services.
"The Constitution for the united states of America".
The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same
document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in
an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking
it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is
not.
So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered
Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic
Constitution
The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers.
Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This
could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men
(assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money
and power.
By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the
People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the
Declaration of Independence and the original Constitution.
The
US corporation (originally called the District of Columbia) does not
effect or control the 50 sovereign states that are protected from the
federal government by the US Constitution for the United States adopted in 1788.The same said Public Offices mentioned above Effectively Suspended and Impaired the Constitution of the United States (A Corporate Charter) Under Pretense of Fraud of these same Emergency Conditions.
The Impairments and Disabilities yet exist and are in full force and effect throughout the Nation and Several States of the Union. There has occured continuous breech of trust, duty and obligation imposed under Alleged Authority of the Constitution of the United States (A Corporate Charter), resulting continued abridgement of Rights, Privlages, Immunities, and Liberties of Citizens and others, all commited under Pretense of Fraud of a continuing National crises and Furtherance of Emergency Conditions.
In the "Forward" of the United States Senate Report 93-549, 1973 it States "Since March 9, 1933, the United States of America has been in a declared state of National Emergency (Bankruptcy), which has not been resolved.
Senate Report 93-549, 1973, admits and professes that "This vast range of powers taken together confers enough authority to rule our country without reference to normal Constitutional Process."
Whereas: Notice Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260 on or about March 4, to March 9, 1933.
In Title 12 U.S.C. sec 95b, it is arbitrarily declared that "The Actions, Regulations, Rules, Licenses, Orders and Proclamations heretofore and hereafter taken, promulgated, made or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury Since March 4, 1933, Pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12 U.S.C. sec 95a), are hereby approved and confirmed, (March 9, 1933, Ch 1. Title 1. Sec 1. 48 Stat. 1.)
Therefore: It is recognized that every Order Issued by the President since March 9,1933, or any Order Issued thereafter is and was automatically approved and confirmed.
These Powers being conferred under Purported (Fraud) Authority of the Act of October 6, 1917 as Amended, are wrongfully used against the Several States of the Union and the People (See Stoehr vs. Wallace 255 US 239)
Notice the Banking Emergency Act, 48 Stat. 1. March 9, 1933, Pay Close Attention to Clause 5(b), which changed the wording of "Enemy" in the War Powers Act of October 6, 1917, as amended to "Citizens within this Country, by any Person within the United States, or any place subject to the Jurisdiction thereof."
Therefore Declaring "War" on the Sovereign American People, by the Fraudulent Corporate U.S., or U.S.A. INC.
TO BE CONTINUED.
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Monday, July 2, 2012
A Lesson From Crazy Horse by Chris Hedges
The original article is at this LINK
A Lesson From Crazy Horse by Chris Hedges
Native Americans' resistance to the westward expansion of Europeans took two forms. One was violence. The other was accommodation. Neither worked. Their land was stolen, their communities were decimated, their women and children were gunned down and the environment was ravaged. There was no legal recourse. There was no justice. There never is for the oppressed. And as we face similar forces of predatory, unchecked corporate power intent on ruthless exploitation and stripping us of legal and physical protection, we must confront how we will respond.
The ideologues of rapacious capitalism, like members of a primitive cult, chant the false mantra that natural resources and expansion are infinite. They dismiss calls for equitable distribution as unnecessary. They say that all will soon share in the "expanding" wealth, which in fact is swiftly diminishing. And as the whole demented project unravels, the elites flee like roaches to their sanctuaries. At the very end, it all will come down like a house of cards.
Civilizations in the final stages of decay are dominated by elites out of touch with reality. Societies strain harder and harder to sustain the decadent opulence of the ruling class, even as it destroys the foundations of productivity and wealth. Karl Marx was correct when he called unregulated capitalism "a machine for demolishing limits." This failure to impose limits cannibalizes natural resources and human communities. This time, the difference is that when we go the whole planet will go with us. Catastrophic climate change is inevitable. Arctic ice is in terminal decline. There will soon be so much heat trapped in the atmosphere that any attempt to scale back carbon emissions will make no difference. Droughts. Floods. Heat waves. Killer hurricanes and tornados. Power outages. Freak weather. Rising sea levels. Crop destruction. Food shortages. Plagues.
ExxonMobil, BP and the coal and natural gas companies—like the colonial buffalo hunters who left thousands of carcasses rotting in the sun after stripping away the hides, and in some cases carrying away only the tongues—will never impose rational limits on themselves. They will exploit, like the hustlers before them who eliminated the animals that sustained the native peoples of the Great Plains, until there is nothing left to exploit. Collective suicide is never factored into quarterly profit reports. Forget all those virtuous words they taught you in school about our system of government. The real words to describe American power are "plunder," "fraud," "criminality," "deceit," "murder" and "repression."
Those native communities that were most accommodating to the European colonists, such as the peaceful California tribes—the Chilulas, Chimarikos, Urebures, Nipewais and Alonas, along with a hundred other bands—were the first to be destroyed. And while I do not advocate violence, indeed will seek every way to avoid it, I have no intention of accommodating corporate power whether it hides behind the mask of Barack Obama or Mitt Romney. At the same time, I have to acknowledge that resistance may ultimately be in vain. Yet to resist is to say something about us as human beings. It keeps alive the possibility of hope, even as all empirical evidence points to inevitable destruction. It makes victory, however remote, possible. And it makes life a little more difficult for the ruling class, which satisfies the very human emotion of vengeance.
"Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power," wrote the philosopher John Locke, "they put themselves into a state of war with the people who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience."
The European colonists signed, and ignored, some 400 treaties with native tribes. They enticed the native leaders into accords, always to seize land, and then repeated the betrayal again and again and again until there was nothing left to steal. Chiefs such as Black Kettle who believed the white men did not fare much better than those who did not. Black Kettle, who outside his lodge often flew a huge American flag given to him in Washington as a sign of friendship, was shot dead by soldiers of George Armstrong Custer in November 1868 along with his wife and more than 100 other Cheyenne in his encampment on the Washita River.
The white men "made us many promises, more than I can remember," Chief Red Cloud said in old age, "but they kept but one. They promised to take our land, and they took it."
Native societies, in which people redistributed wealth to gain respect, and in which those who hoarded were detested, upheld a communal ethic that had to be obliterated and replaced with the greed, ceaseless exploitation and cult of the self that fuel capitalist expansion. Lewis Henry Morgan in his book "League of the Iroquois," written in 1851 after he lived among them, noted that the Iroquois' "whole civil policy was averse to the concentration of power in the hands of any single individual, but inclined to the opposite principle of division among a number of equals. ..." This was a way of relating to each other, as well as to the natural world, that was an anathema to the European colonizers.
Those who exploit do so through layers of deceit. They hire charming and eloquent interlocutors. How many more times do you want to be lied to by Barack Obama? What is this penchant for self-delusion that makes us unable to see that we are being sold into bondage? Why do we trust those who do not deserve our trust? Why are we repeatedly seduced? The promised closure of Guantanamo. The public option in health care. Reforming the Patriot Act. Environmental protection. Restoring habeas corpus. Regulating Wall Street. Ending the wars. Jobs. Defending labor rights. I could go on.
There are few resistance figures in American history as noble as Crazy Horse. He led, long after he knew that ultimate defeat was inevitable, the most effective revolt on the plains, wiping out Custer and his men on the Little Big Horn. "Even the most basic outline of his life shows how great he was," Ian Frazier writes in his book "Great Plains," "because he remained himself from the moment of his birth to the moment he died; because he knew exactly where he wanted to live, and never left; because he may have surrendered, but he was never defeated in battle; because, although he was killed, even the Army admitted he was never captured; because he was so free that he didn't know what a jail looked like." His "dislike of the oncoming civilization was prophetic," Frazier writes. "He never met the President" and "never rode on a train, slept in a boarding house, ate at a table." And "unlike many people all over the world, when he met white men he was not diminished by the encounter."
Crazy Horse was bayoneted to death on Sept. 5, 1877, after being tricked into walking toward the jail at Fort Robinson in Nebraska. The moment he understood the trap he pulled out a knife and fought back. Gen. Phil Sheridan had intended to ship Crazy Horse to the Dry Tortugas, a group of small islands in the Gulf of Mexico, where a U.S. Army garrison ran a prison with cells dug out of the coral. Crazy Horse, even when dying, refused to lie on the white man's cot. He insisted on being placed on the floor. Armed soldiers stood by until he died. And when he breathed his last, Touch the Clouds, Crazy Horse's seven-foot-tall Miniconjou friend, pointed to the blanket that covered the chief's body and said, "This is the lodge of Crazy Horse." His grieving parents buried Crazy Horse in an undisclosed location. Legend says that his bones turned to rocks and his joints to flint. His ferocity of spirit remains a guiding light for all who seek lives of defiance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)