Counsel General Interim Gov't Republic of Texas
Responds to Judge Tom Head
KCBD News Channel 11 Reports on Judge Tom Head with Counsel General at Podium 1:10 2/3
Counsel General was quoted by the New York Times and Austin American-Statesman:
Responds to Judge Tom Head
KCBD News Channel 11 Reports on Judge Tom Head with Counsel General at Podium 1:10 2/3
Counsel General was quoted by the New York Times and Austin American-Statesman:
“I believe that we need a sheriff’s militia to protect Lubbock County,
and get all the sheriffs in Texas to start a militia to protect Texas,”
Kim Wade Gatewood, 48, told the commissioners and Mr. Head.
After the hearing, Mr. Gatewood, an agricultural contractor, identified
himself as the counsel general of the interim government of the Republic
of Texas, which he said was not active at the moment. “If secession
happens,” he said, “it’ll be active in a split second.”
Text of the Video:
At this point I do not know if there is anything I can do
Officially as Counsel General of the Interim Government of the Republic
of Texas, but as a fellow Texian-Texican National living on the soil of
Texas, I
do have to come out and Back Lubbock County Judge Tom Head and Yes,
Civil unrest, Civil disobedience and maybe Civil War looms ahead for
America, but Texas is a different story which may soon be on the blog http://NewTexasNation.blogspot.com/
Now on Judge Tom Heads' comment on Standing at the border and just having the Sheriffs Office Back him, the Invading Forces would run right over Judge Tom Head and the Sheriff's office.
We really need to raise the Tax 2 cents and every cent
goes to beef up the Lubbock County Sheriffs Office, and form a
Sheriff's Militia out of the Population in Lubbock County. I contend
that the Sheriff and his Deputies Keep all the arresting Power as Peace
Officers, but the Sheriff's Militia be trained for the contingency of
Combat to be called out under the Sheriff in the case of an invasion.
Every Person above the age of 18 who Does NOT have a Felony Record serve
in the Sheriff's Militia's for the Protection of Lubbock County and for
the Protection of Texas.
Just
think of the Great Standing Army Texas would have, if each Sheriff in
each County formed a Sheriff's Militia. Then the saying "Don't Mess With Texas" would be exact!
The Sheriff is
the highest elected Official in the County and not even the Office of
the President cannot usurp authority over him. That in itself would be a
direct violation of the 10th Amendment and Article III sec. III of the
Constitution for the united States of America.
Therefore; I Duly Hereby
Stand and Back and Endorse Lubbock County Judge Tom Head and I call for
the formation of the Sheriffs Militia.
As for county Democratic
Party's chief Kenny Ketner, Apparently you don't know what is going on,
or just don't care. Due to the fact I have sat for 20 years doing my
study and research. NO, Judge Tom Head does not need to resign, rather
proceed for preparations in the event something goes awry as Judge Head Stated.
Attorney
Rod Hobson, I do not take the fact you placed U.N. Flags around or near
your Office as a joke. That offended me personally as a Natural Born
Texian National. That is really Mocking and Serious to all Texians, and I
don't appreciate what you said about Tom Head, and I quote: "When I
saw the story I thought, once again, Lubbock is going to be the
laughingstock of the entire nation," you said. And you went on to say,
and I quote: "What makes it so sad is he is our elected county judge,
who is in charge of a multimillion-dollar budget. That is scary. It's
like the light's on, but no one is home. ... I'd just like to think he's
off his meds."
Sir, what meds? There is nothing wrong with Judge Tom Head.
Then the lone Democrat
Lubbock County Commissioner Gilbert Flores, described Head with a
colorful West Texas saying: "He's a six-pack short of a full case of
beer, if you know what I mean."
Sir, You have not done your
research either as I have many years and saying what you did about
Judge Tom head is just ridiculous.
The Constitution for the united states of America 1787 states in the 10th Amendment:
The powers not
delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it
to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the
people.
Next: In the Second Amendment:
A
well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
A Sheriff's Militia would definitely be a well- regulated Militia.
Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist
only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies,
giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason
unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on
Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of Treason,
but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or
Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained.
THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1. BILL OF RIGHTS
That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, we declare:
Sec. 1. FREEDOM
AND SOVEREIGNTY OF STATE. Texas is a free and independent State,
subject only to the Constitution of the United States, and the
maintenance of our free institutions and the perpetuity of the Union
depend upon the preservation of the right of local self-government,
unimpaired to all the States.
Sec. 2. INHERENT
POLITICAL POWER; REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. All political power is
inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their
authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of
Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of
government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times
the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in
such manner as they may think expedient.
Sec. 22. TREASON.
Treason against the State shall consist only in levying war against it,
or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort; and no person
shall be convicted of treason except on the testimony of two witnesses
to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
Sec. 23. RIGHT
TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. Every citizen shall have the right to keep and
bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the
Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms,
with a view to prevent crime.
Sec. 24. MILITARY SUBORDINATE TO CIVIL AUTHORITY. The military shall at all times be subordinate to the civil authority.
Sec. 25. QUARTERING
SOLDIERS IN HOUSES. No soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in
the house of any citizen without the consent of the owner, nor in time
of war but in a manner prescribed by law.
In the Constitution of the Republic of Texas 1836.
This
declaration of rights is declared to be a part of this constitution, and
shall never be violated on any pretense whatever. And in order to guard
against the transgression of the high powers which we have delegated,
we declare that everything in this bill of rights contained, and every
other right not hereby delegated, is reserved to the people.
1st. All
men, when they form a social compact, have equal rights; and no men or
set of men are entitled to exclusive public privileges or emoluments
from the community.
2nd. All
political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are
founded on their authority and instituted for their benefit; and they
have at all times an inalienable right to alter their government in such
manner as they may think proper.
14th. Every citizen shall have the right to bear arms in defense of himself and the republic.
The military shall at all times and in all cases be subordinate to the civil power.
15th. The sure and certain defense of a free people is a
well-regulated militia; and it shall be the duty of the legislature to
enact such laws as may be necessary to the organizing of the militia of
this republic.
16th. Treason
against this republic shall consist only in levying war against it, or
adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and support. No retrospective
or ex post facto law, or laws impairing the obligations of contracts, shall be made.
The
sheriff is unique in the law enforcement arena in that he is the last,
and only, law enforcement administrator that is elected to his office by
the people. The administrative heads of all other law enforcement
entities are appointed to their positions, either by mayors, city
councils, city managers, and politicians or other managerial boards. The
people have no voice in the selection of these law enforcement
administrators, and no recourse if they do not agree with their
policies. The sheriff is the only law enforcement official with the
authority to summon the power of the county.....
The
sheriff is the only law enforcement official with the authority to
summon the power of the county. The sheriff's has the right, granted by
Posse Comitatus, to assemble a militia or posse, and the power to
deputize citizens and require them to assist in the keeping of the peace
and the enforcement of laws. The sheriff represents the power of the
people; he does not represent the power of the state. His use of the
power of the state must not conflict with his obligation to protect the
individual rights of the people whom he represents. When it comes to
keeping the peace no one's authority exceeds that of the sheriff. The
sheriff is absolutely obligated to his duty to protect the rights of the
people, and that obligation is primary to any
obligation whatever to support other law enforcement agencies in whatever cause.
The
people in states where sheriff’s offices have not been
unconstitutionally eliminated should demand that their sheriffs’ live up
to their obligation to represent the interests of the people who elect
them, and if they refuse to do so, the people should remove them because
they are unfit to occupy the office.
The court confirms and asserts
that “the duly elected sheriff of a county is the highest law
enforcement official within a county and has law enforcement powers
EXCEEDING that of any other state OR federal official.” And you thought
the 10th Amendment was dead and buried.
(Case No. 2:96-cv-099-J (2006)) and announced that all federal
officials are forbidden to enter his county without his prior approval
……
“If a sheriff doesn’t want the Feds in his county he has
the constitutional right and power to keep them out, or ask them to
leave, or retain them in custody.”
The Sheriff has the Right, Power, Duty and Obligation to tell all occupying Agency from outside of Texas to vacate the County, Including the T.S.A.
The Sheriff's Duty and Obligation doubles with each Citizen who Demands that all occupying Agency from outside of Texas to vacate the County, Including the T.S.A.
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT HAS RULED.
The “supremacy clause” is dealt with in Mack/Printz, in which the U.S. Supreme Court stated once and for all, that the only thing “supreme” is the Constitution itself. Where by the powers, the Sheriff reigns supreme above the president.
On June 27th, 1997, the sheriffs won; in Printz v. U.S. (521 U.S. 898) the U.S. Supreme Court struck Brady down. Associate Justice Antonin Scalia wrote
the ruling for the Court, in which he explained our system of
government at length. The justly revered system of checks and balances
is the key:
THE COURTS HAVE SPOKEN! “Any legislation
including the Patriot Acts which attempts to compel State Officers to
execute Federal Law is unconstitutional. Further, any federal
investigational liberties can be forbidden by the States’ highest law
enforcement officer. Finally, any attempts by a federal agency to coerce
compliance to such liberties can be grounds for arrest of any of their
agents who do not comply with the directions of that officer.”
[A quote from the Supreme Court Case below:
"‘[T]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.’”]
"‘[T]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.’”]
And for the fact of: Pursuant to February
21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the
"Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters
61 and 62, And Pursuant to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the
capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28
3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation, (15) "United States" means —
(A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
U.S. Supreme Court
STOUTENBURGH v. HENNICK, 129 U.S. 141 (1889)
129 U.S. 141
STOUTENBURGH, Intendant of Washington Asylum,
v.
HENNICK.
January 14, 1889
Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871,
entitled 'An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia,'
(16 St. 419,) are as follows: 'Section 1. That all that part of the
territory of the United States included within the limits of the
District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a
government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is
hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may
contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be
impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal
corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the
United States and the provisions of this act.' 'Sec. 18. That the
legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144] extend to
all rightful subjects of legislation within said District, consistent
with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this
act,
subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed
upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the
constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative
assembly shall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the
congress of the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to
deprive congress of the power of legislation over said District in as
ample manner as if this law had not been enacted.' These sections are
carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled 'An
act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United States, general
and permanent in their nature, relating to the District of Columbia, in
force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,' as sections 2, 49, 50.
Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district not exceeding ten miles square, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States.
And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First
Congress passed an act entitled "An Act to Provide a Government for the
District of Columbia," legislating the organization of a municipal
corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbia,
the seat of government, which transferred the United States of America,
the Republic, into "a corporate entity" entitled UNITED STATES, in
capital letters, having "no" jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia.
And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution
as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporation. This
municipal corporation was granted the power to contract to provide
municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and
necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of
Article Four of the Constitution, any other person who chooses to
contract for its services.
The US corporation (originally called the District of Columbia ) does not effect or control the 50 sovereign states that are protected from the federal government by the US Constitution for the United States adopted in 1788.
No comments:
Post a Comment